• SSTF@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That opinion is based on junk science that was promoted by anti-skub lobbiests. In the last 20 years no credible research has duplicated the findings that skub is (under normal conditions) hazardous in tall buildings.

    • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah right. Hey thanks, shill. How much are they paying you to troll around and peddle your propaganda? You know, if anything, we should thank you. Because once the crop analyses findings are published, showing how your underground labs have genetically modified the skub seeds to consume all the inferior strains, then you can stand there and claim to have no vested interest in the skub wars.

      I bet you own your share of shares in the Skubfiber®™ bookbinding process.

      You’re a disgrace to the name of Ferdinand J. M. Brambleskub IV, may his brain endure in cryogenic stasis for all eternity.