I did it and it never occurred to me to even ask what other people thought about it. It was a benefit available to me, so I took advantage of it. If your coworkers said that real men don’t care about their teeth, would it stop you from going to the dentist? Coworkers come and go but family is for life.
“Stand With Tesla.” Musk reposted it to his massive audience, but the sentiment didn’t prevent him from losing $23 billion the following day.
I think he needs to do something bold to silence all the haters. He needs to ride that next Starship launch personally. He should bring his pet president along too. Safety regulations be damned! It’s time for action.
Every time I see the words Secretary of State Marco Rubio I almost do a spit take.
In former Soviet Russia, gift gets you!
Super surprised to see Publix leading this list.
I’ll be the American in the fourth panel of that We’re the Millers meme.
You guys have minimum standards?
Tesla and Shitter can both fail and he’ll still be fine as long as they get Starship working reliably. Kessler Syndrome is probably the only move left that he’s afraid of.
People who stand in the way of this type of thing are be risking jail and death.
The US will honor treaties when they are politically or economically advantageous to the leadership at the time. Everything else is up for negotiation. At the end of the barrel of a gun.
If you give some rich people a butt load of money they will tell a judge that the wind is the real culprit here. The blame truly belongs to a butterfly. If you give that judge some fancy rich people trips, they’ll agree and that’s perfectly legal and perfectly fine. If anything, noticing it and making the judge feel bad about it is the problem that really needs to be addressed.
Don’t they have paid firefighters for the rich and volunteers for everyone else? I think I remember hearing about Oprah’s property being protected first when Hawaii was burning last. I would expect something similar in California. Money talks.
We should have a code word or something. I’m thinking
Lemmy outta here!
I’ll continue not playing the game I’ve never played before. I’m doing my part!
So it says that instead of doubling capacity, which we did, we should have tripled capacity, when instead we developed more solar, because it was cheaper, and therefore more to efficienct. Personally, I’m glad to see we doubled wind capacity, and spent money more efficiently on solar. I don’t understand why everything has to be framed as a negative. I think I used too many commas in that first sentence but I’m sticking with it. Honestly, you guys are lucky I’m proofreading at all.
Now do the corporations.
It’s all media silos.Take the money out of news. Implement a fairness doctrine for the Information Age.
He just caught a scratch. Holding up his arm isn’t the smart thing to do but that just makes it more authentic.
I flat out don’t accept the notion that some starts have no planets. As far as I am concerned, if we have 8 major plantes and on average, 40% of planets are ejected, we should assume the average number of starting planets is 11.