good point, i think i agree. i was half joking anyway, but on the other hand it’s also good to introspect from time to time to understand where my idea of “fullest” came from.
- 1 Post
- 146 Comments
live your life to its fullest is overrated, cringe and government propaganda.
This feels like it could be a legitimate use of LLM.
motherfuckers with a corruption fetish when I tell them about memory corruption and what you can do with a C compiler.
Then I saved like a billion by not building a space station, or something.
nialv7@lemmy.worldto Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•My parents wanted serotonin, so they had a baby. now i am forced to wage slave for the worst of us.91·13 days agoYou gonna practice what you preach?
Shouldn’t it be “we are attractive, yes”.
nialv7@lemmy.worldto Linux Gaming@lemmy.world•Games run faster on SteamOS than Windows 11, Ars testing findsEnglish31·14 days agoMaybe wine/proton is just better at Windowsing than Windows is.
Those creatures that live around high temperatures hydrothermal vents, they don’t get their energy from the sun!
Ok, you bought a Cornetto once and was surprised by chocolate. Surely you learned after the first time and can just stop buying it? Where’s this obsession coming from, why can’t you move on?
it’s ok to not get radiation poisoning
nialv7@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.world•Trump can pull the plug on the internet, and Europe can’t do anything about itEnglish22·17 days agoI hope this means people finally start to see the danger of centralization.
Butterfly effect, your investments changes the fate of the companies you invest in.
by that definition do vegans have to grow their own vegetables? you know, capitalism and exploitation of labor and such.
but this is not impossible or out of ordinary though. you can even imagine stacking a couple cardboard boxes into that shape. i think it’s out of place because it’s too ordinary, because you’d expect some kind of symmetry, regularity, etc. from idealized mathematical shapes, but you didn’t. instead you just get some random looking stack of boxes.
Wish granted, now you have smart, and truly evil people in the government.
I did say “general purpose”. And many proof assistants are Turing Complete actually, such as Lean.
It’s not what you can use that language to do - all general purpose languages are Turing Complete, so what you can do with them is exactly equal. It is about what the language will do for you. Rust compiler will stop you from writing memory unsafe code, C compiler cannot do that.
Man will literally go to India instead of going to couples counseling.