• 0 Posts
  • 118 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 7th, 2024

help-circle

  • Data Analyst: So what do you want to measure? What question do you want to answer?
    Customer: Can you do a column chart, where I can see how many Orders we have?
    Data Analyst: Column chart? What’s the Axis? Per day?
    Customer: No, per month.
    Data Analyst: Right, so new Orders per month?
    Customer: No, how many we have in general, new and old.
    Data Analyst: Do you mean the old ones still open at the start of the month?
    Customer: That’s a good idea, yeah. Actually, can you add the ones we complete in that month too?
    Data Analyst: The amount of completed orders? That would double-count them.

    *shared moment of confusion*

    Customer: Don’t make it so complicated, I just want to see how many orders we had.
    Data Analyst: Let me ask again, what question do you want to answer?
    Customer: I want to know how much our teams are working.
    Data Analyst: As in, how many orders they’re completing?
    Customer: I also want to see if we need more people.
    Data Analyst: Like, if they can’t complete all their orders? So basically, the rate of completed versus new ones?
    Customer: Ooooh, good idea, can you put that rate as a line over our chart of new, old and completed orders?

    Customer: Oh, and the warranty returns too! They need to be processed as well, that’s also work.

    Customer: Actually, we have this task tracking for who does which work for the order or warranty return.
    Data Analyst: Shouldn’t we use that to track how much work the teams are doing?
    Customer: Yes, put it in the chart too.


    Epilogue: The Customer got a separate chart for the tasks - turns out I’m not charging by the chart, so you don’t need to cram as much as possible into a single chart. They also were persuaded to stick with “Old” and “New” to show the total workload, with the “Old” bars providing an indicator for how much stayed open and whether the backlog was growing.




  • I’m in a superposition of knowledgeable and ignorant until you ask me something, in which case I produce either a good or a stupid answer, depending on various random factors such as whether I’m versed in the general topic, happen to know the specific subject of the question or just get lucky with guessing.

    (This analogy breaks apart if you consider the possibility of giving a mediocre answer that’s neither accurate nor entirely stupid, which probably makes it the perfect self-defeating counterexample)













  • I think the point was that some numbskulls try to pull a “checkmate vegans” claiming that. You probably know the type, obnoxiously trying to butt in on vegan discussions and go “but if you’re fine with breastfeeding, you’re not really vegan”, misunderstanding (or misconstruing) the motivations in the same vein as mentioned before.