Lem Jukes

Oh you sweet summer child.

Especially with Uranus right there for blue… i feel like Crab Nebula for purple can get a pass though.

Missed opportunity not calling it a Mallowpaca IMO

(Or Mallpacaow)

Duh, just sit in the non smoking section and you’ll be fine.

It’s a turn of phrase, not a literal statement.

The fuck is this hog wash?

On what charge? For enjoying a meal? A succulent Chinese meal?

Downvoting you specifically for saying you’ll get downvotes for expressing a rational thought in response to a linkedinlunatic post. How dare you.

But also you’re right, bullshit tests should be called out as bullshit and employers should be shamed for pulling stupid shit like this. This is a business transaction where I’m selling you my time and skills for less than their worth so you can exploit that for a profit. You(the employer) should be fucking thanking me.

Fuck bullshit tests

Please explain this to:

-My Job

And then subsequently(or convince my job to migrate to foss alts for the following)

-Adobe

-Autodesk

-Vectric

-Google(workspaces)

-intuit

-Trimble

sure but this is linux memes , so nuance and rational thought mean dick all mehbreveh

Np, appreciate the acknowledgment.

I’ll pass.

You wanna share your opinion as it differs to mine, I’m happy to engage with that. But I am absolutely not interested in whatever tit for tat, nit-picky debate that wants to be.

I’m saying as long as the consumption of animals and animal products is part of the most viable means for satisfying the nutritional debt of the human species, the human psychological need to distinguish between pets and livestock is necessary.

Do we need, or is it right to keep pets? is its own set of moral questions.

I agree with you in principle, but until at which point we have the technological and production capabilities in place to fully feed the planet without the need for livestock and other animal sources of nutrients, the distinction has to exist. We may have gotten to the point of being technologically capable but the human population is very much reliant on animal sources to sustain itself. And so the distinction is necessary. I’m not arguing that it’s right or just or morally correct. But it’s where we are and what is required to continue existing as a species.

And by no means am I saying that those animals we see as livestock don’t deserve to be treated with care and respect while they are alive. I just believe the distinctive categories of pets and livestock are an unfortunate requirement of our current situation.

To clarify I meant schnirittos was giving the libertarian vibes of immediately calling any amount of curation or harm reduction via removal on social media sites a blanket ‘censorship bad slipery slope boogie woogie.’ And was agreeing with whom I directly replied to.

Schnirittos’ (I know I’m getting it wrong but i just can’t be bothered to go check for a third time I’m sorry) comment, I think, exemplifies(in part) the American-bastardized version of libertarianism you describe.

Like, yea this is a thing to be concerned about in general, but this/here is not it my guy…

Giving me that libertarian vibe of wanting to be fiercely independent of the thing they rely on for survival.

To clarify, this comment is agreeing with whom it is a direct reply of and commenting on the poster they are replying to.

That bottom bowl looks plastic, just push on the side gently to try and break the seal around the other dish.

People who treat pets as property are not good people. This guy gets it.

Gods I miss TFTS so bad