Funny enough. Sweden already went through that problem. We call it “Age of Greatness”. (Stormaktstiden)

Basically. Sweden got too big too fast, couldn’t maintain an army large enough to secure everything. If i remember correctly, we couldn’t produce enough food, and we lost a bunch of territory.

Not legal in Sweden. Our “IRS” must also accept the name and deem it legal.

I for one like this. As it stops some very stupid people to name their children some very stupid names. Such as “Adolf Hitler”.

And yes. Someone did try to name their child this and they were appropriately stoped from doing it.

I see. I think I’m starting to understand. It makes sense when you mention that energy has been very cheap.

Why spend money on new windows when the difference in the energy bill is just a few bucks.

Windows like we have? It’s just two panes of glass with a gap between the panes for air to act as an insulant.

Even with plastic windows, you can have two panes with a gap and it will work too.

I believe you. I just really struggle to comprehend that not being standard in parta where you get snow and cold. Or it being considered “extra”. It’s not alien technology. It’s two panes with a gap between them. That’s it.

The US. Got it. Say no more.

Yes

That’s the dumbest thing I’ve heard. The part about there not being good or bad winter drivers.

Honestly. Most of your tips sounds what someone says that was a tourist somewhere cold once in their life and now pretends to know what they’re talking about.

Sincerely. Someone born and raised in the north.

What is north for you? I see so many tips being the dumbest things I’ve ever heard of.

Like plastic wrap on your windows. Sounds like something stupid Americans does instead of buying proper insulated windows.

Not saying I’m a expert. But I am a Swede and deal with snow and cold every year.

Most people don’t like every single movie, so why do people say they like movies?

Doesn’t have to be.

No. Mostly they’re put in place to protect the domestic industry from being run out of business from cheap exports.

Not at all. It’s necessary to protect your own industry.

If Canada didn’t impose tariffs on US dairy, Canadian dairy farmers couldn’t afford to compete against US subsidized Dairy. And it’s quite important for a nation to maintain its own food production.

It’s quite incredible how much one can manage to post when it’s your full time job

alleging it “not only offers the hardware and firmware to create and play pirated games” but also provides “customers with copies of pirated Nintendo games.”

I can see a world where he can offer hardware and firmware, with claims of other intended purposes.

But the second part wherehe provides customers with pirated software is a slam dunk for nintendo.

Den är godkänd i Sverige. Hon är baserad i Sverige. Och är inte ens i samma typ av marknad. De kan försöka och hota med rättegång men hon kommer vinna. Och Hugo Boss kommer få stå för hennes rättegångskostnader.

Lycka till.

Debian is the best defense of the incident and I couldn’t find the exact opposite way to them by now I am little bit of a political symbol that I am little more about business and I don’t want you

No. I’m really not. And as I’ve explained so many times. There are evidence available to make that conclusion plausible.

The word you are looking for is proof. But you not understanding the difference between evidence and proof is another issue.

Yikes, you really want to strawman this as hard as you can.

Not sure what you’re quoting but it ain’t me.

There is evidence to draw the conclusion that an estimate of 180k dead is plausible. Everything from the length of the war, the documented lack of aid reaching the region, the documented destruction of medical facilities to the The documented destruction of habital areas.

I understand fully that there are ~40k deaths reported from within. I think it’s entierly plausible that the real number of deaths as an indirect cause of the war are far higher than that. Personally I think it’s more than plausible. I think it’s likely. But I’ll stick with plausible just for you.

It is based on evidence.

Evidence that very little aid is reaching Gaza. Evidence that clean water is difficult to come by. Evidence that 35% of their builds are severely damaged or destroyed. Evidence from previous wars and how the population were affected by similar conditions.

With those points of data. Qualified people can make estimations of what they think the number of dead might look like.

But there is no evidence to prove the estimation is correct right until after the war is over.

What you want to say, is that there’s no proof. Which is correct. There is no proof for the figure. Because again. It’s an estimation. There is a war. We can’t go dig up the bodies just yet

Gaza had an estimated population of about 2 million people.

We know that 35% of the buildings in Gaza is severely damaged or destroyed. Very little aid is reaching their target, hospitals are destroyed.

There is nothing disingenuous about me agreeing with them that it’s plausible that an estimated number of deaths as a result from the war is up towards 180 thousand.