• Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I think this lacks an open mind. This reaction isn’t that surprising though, I do get why you and other people are very invested in this. I think you’re too wedded to gender overall though, I find the camp of trans people writing about the idea that eventually society will enter a post-gender phase to be the most compelling theory. If gender can be abolished then it can also change.

    • Juniper (she/her) 🫐@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Gender abolitionism usually focuses on roles and rigidity surrounding it, not the idea that we will eventually have no actual genders. Gender is biologically real but all the social constructs surrounding it are not. If this is not what you have read, I’m interested in links.

      But there is no world in which I am not a woman - but very much a world where I am happy to reject the social constructs built up around womanhood.

      I still posit that anyone that can actually change their gender (not realize it and change presentation and potentially roles) was gender fluid in the first place.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 hour ago

        This reasoning errs much too close to bio-essentialism for me, it’s the same line of thinking that leads people to “you have to have dysphoria or you’re not trans”.