• CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    Italiano
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Solution to the problem: ban right-wingers, impose socialism and if rich people get too noisy send secret services to deal with them Pinochet-style. Bam, capitalism defeated in a few years.

      • CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        Italiano
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nah, it is. Seize all their assets and if they complain, again, some Pinochet-style methods that will bend them to our knees.

        Sorry, patience is over and right-wingers and their financiers must be dealt with the appropriate way.

            • psud@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’d do it differently.

              I would fund a massive advertising campaign preaching equality, fairness, and cooperation

              I would use the tax system to weaken the cycle of intergenerational wealth (the ultra wealthy spend borrowed money which is settled by their estate on death; I would tax bequests to banks; I would tax inheritances above a pretty high limit.

              It would take time. The aim would be to have a much more level wealth distribution

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Seize who’s assets exactly? The second you draw a line and say anyone on the other side has fewer rights than you, you’re falling right in line with those same right-wing policies.

          There is no way to define a law against “right-wingers” that doesn’t infringe on basic rights like freedom of opinion and freedom from discrimination. You can’t punish people for being part of a group. You need to point to something specific that each individual has done that is illegal before prosecuting. Anything less and society will break down into fascism.

          • CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            Italiano
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Seize who’s assets exactly?

            Rich people’s

            The second you draw a line and say anyone on the other side has fewer rights than you

            Nah, just do it against rich people.

            There is no way to define a law against “right-wingers” that doesn’t infringe on basic rights like freedom of opinion and freedom from discrimination. You can’t punish people for being part of a group. You need to point to something specific that each individual has done that is illegal before prosecuting. Anything less and society will break down into fascism.

            Fuck this fake democracy then.

    • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s systems built to reward the exploitation of the many by a few powerful individuals. It’s not a sin that is the issue, it’s the actual political-economic systems that are currently being maintained.

  • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Fascism should rightly be called Corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power.” - Benito Mussolini

    • tromars@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I‘m not disagreeing with what you’re trying to convey but still: Mussolini very likely never said/wrote that, seems to have been misattributed. IF he did, the Italian word corporazioni, while technically translating to corporations, doesn’t refer to private companies, which in Italian are normally called società.

      More info:

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ehh i wouldnt agree, heavy capitalists are usually pretty liberal because they dont like regulation. There is some precident of big factory and company owners actually fighting against faschism(not for the good reasons tho). I do agree with lesser right wing ideologies just being “recruitment” for far-righters. Wewe seen them radicalise so many times in the past that it should be obvious by now that any amount of right leads to more far-right.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Capitalism doesn’t care what people feel about it, it moves according to its structure. Just because libertarians don’t like Capitalism doesn’t mean they can stop monopoly Capitalism from lobbying for regulations.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      All liberal capitalists want a full on chain of commands and dictator level control over their domain employees. The only difference is that they want “market forces” to force people to work for them instead of violence.

      • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah thats true. Maybe this is like reading into the nuance of how a work camp is better than a death camp because you at least produce something before dying a horrible death. But i still stand by my opinion that the meme isnt completely true.

        • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I would certainly not say that adding extra torment by forcing people to work as a profit incentive for capitalists would make said death camp any less abhorrent.

          • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes thats what im saying in my comment? Maybe my language was unclear but i meant that my original comment is also a useless comparison.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        One time I had a brain fart when I was reading about the United the Right rally and was confused why “national socialists” were there lol. Aren’t socialists left? Then I was like “…oh. literal Nazis.”

    • joyhunter@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You can’t actually combine Nationalism and Socialism as Socialism is directly opposed to Nationalism. Mussolini went over this many times how “It is an error of Socialism to exclude Nationalism”(paraphrased), the Socialist aspect is reduced to the future where the “others” have been eradicated, which will never actually happen as Hitler went from “There are 5 white races” to “All Mediterraneans have been negrified” and I’ve no doubt he would eventually consider all slavs to be “mongolized”.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Maybe we shouldn’t be using an economic system whose immune system has historically lead to genocide, especially in an age where nukes are now a thing.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If it’s protecting capitalism, wouldn’t you mean when the wealth gap is too small? As in it is a driving force of the wealth gap?

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, as the Petite Bourgeoisie are proletarianized by the formation of Monopoly Capitalism, the Petite Bourgeoisie aligns with the Bourgeoisie against the Proletariat, who at the time gain class consciousness and are increasingly sympathetic to Socialism and Communism. Fascism is a defense mechanism against Communism.

  • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Behind the Nazis is what they learned from Trail of Tears and US antebellum slavery. Behind that, you get Rome.

    It’s war. War is behind all fascism.

  • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Facsism is just capitalism when you try to say no.

    Understandably, workers didn’t like capitalism. So, when they found out about socialism, many of them grouped up and tried to say no. After which, facsism was made to counter this.

    So, I mean literally fascism is just capitalism when you try to say no. You only get mercan staal neo classical economics because you say yes.