So a bunch of people in this subreddit told me that uTorrent was trash and to switch to QBitTorrent.

I didn’t think much of it. How could one be so much better than the other? They’re both just torrent downloaders.

Holy shit was I wrong. I don’t even really understand what is happening, but downloading torrents on QBitTorrent is so, so, so much faster and I don’t even understand how.

A movie downloads in basically seconds compared to 10 or 20 minutes on uTorrent.

Why is this? What is this magic? What makes QBitTorrent so much faster?

  • Untitled4774@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    There are a handful of features that I really like with qbittorrent but there were plugins I can’t find replacements for from Deluge:

    • having items deleted after meeting seeding requirements, as *arr auto imports, but having exceptions for private trackers
    • the above without having the *arr stack have a permanent warning
    • auto adding public default trackers to any public torrent

    I’ve switched back and forth a few times and I run them side by side but let deluge take the reins of most of it because I have it set up to be hands off with the above.

    If anyone knows how I can set up qbt the same way that would be great though

  • skydivekingair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I tried grabbing Qbit and all I could find was malware. I used to be so so good at navigating all this stuff and stopped to stream for a little. ☹️

  • LocustOfControl@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I do miss that really detailed block download page, but that’s only cos I’d watch it instead of doing something useful with my life.

  • rockhandle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    UT has been garbage for some time. I reckon the data it uses to send your info back to them and to load ads, bogs down the network, especially on slower networks. The last time I used it, there were also graphical artifacts all over. Qbit on the other hand, is much cleaner and simpler to use, and it doesnt add any unwanted network traffic, which is why it’s probably faster

  • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I switch from uTorrent to qBittorrent when Ninite dropped it. I wasn’t aware that uTorrent had become aware, and Ninite had my back. I trust those guys with the selection of softwares they offer.

      • TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        That feature makes sense to aggregate search results from multiple public trackers, but if you (like me) use private trackers then it’s almost always easier to just go to the actual website for your search. Not to mention any automation software such as the *arr stack make that feature obsolete. It’s definitely a cool feature, but not useful for everyone.

    • mynamesnotrick@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yup, I’m using transmission in a docker container that ensures my VPN is always connected. Nice to not have to worry about that.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t know if uTorrent does ratelimit torrents someway (they shouldn’t be by theory), but it being adware is enough of a result to switch to another torrent client.

    I’m more of a fan of Deluge, but alternatives like qBittorrent / Transmission are solid choices.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    uTorrent has been down the shitter for over a decade now, I wouldn’t be surprised if the download speed was throttled without a pro subscription. It could also be a difference in how the applications discover seeds, or how much CPU time or memory is allocated to downloads.

    As a general rule, if an application is full of anti-features, it tends to have better, usually FOSS, alternatives.

  • Anon518@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I found qBT to be missing features utorrent has, and thus I stick with UT v2.2, which is the latest recommended one before they started making controversial changes. I’ve never had any issues with utorrent’s speed.

      • Anon518@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I checked real quick and the setup guide that changes all the settings according to your internet speed, and the ability to stop torrents when they meet the goal. Qbt can only pause or remove them. Pausing leaves you connected and anti-piracy groups get your IP and submit complaints, and I don’t want them automatically removed. There may be more.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          In qBittorrent, “Pause”, aka “stop”, stops all data transfer and tears down all peer connections associated with the torrent. You can even verify this with Wireshark. This is functionally equivalent to uTorrent’s stop button.

          See this thread here.

            • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              You are very welcome. You aren’t the first person to have been misled by the pause versus stop name convention thing. There are tons of questions about it on the qBT forums showing many other people were concerned that there was no way to ‘stop’ torrents in qBT. I had to look into it myself when I first switched.

          • Anon518@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            I checked it out more, there’s no “remove torrent & delete torrent file”, there’s only “permanently delete files” which is not clear at all and sounds like it will delete both the .torrent and the downloaded files, which is not what I want. utorrent 2.2 seems to be pretty flawless for me.

            • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              If you right click a torrent and select remove, it automatically deletes the torrent files that qBT stores in the appData or home folder. If you check ‘permanently delete files’ it also deletes the media associated with the torrent file.

              Most people dislike uTorrent because of the fact it was loaded with malware(cryptominer) and ads(hopefully the version you are using is before this crap). Also, download speeds are faster on qBitTorrent.

              That being said, the UI is definitely a little different and I understand not wanting to learn a new workflow. You do what works best for you, friend.

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m assuming you mean you were using one of the older, “safe” versions of uTorrent. But yeah, the technology has updated. It’s better.

  • BargsimBoyz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    You were probably using the wrong version of utorrent.

    I think you need something like 1.6. No adware, no malware, just works fast and easy.

  • SterbenDeathGun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    QBittorrent has been my torrent Client for 4/5 years at this point, never having problems. It works on my Steam Deck too (Arch).