• qaz@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    No we do not. Why you might ask? Because the Lemmy’s developers don’t want to allow it because it’s “a slippery slope”

    dessalines:

    We’ve discussed this in another issue at length, but I’m personally against any moderator / admin ability to “modify” other people’s content in any way other than removing / restoring it.

    Its a vector for abuse, and a slippery slope that eventually leads to mods and admins being able to edit other people’s posts and comments.

    I think this is ridiculous and that an ability to mark a comment as NSFW is not harming “user’s integrity” but what can you do?

      • qaz@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yes, moderation tools in general aren’t that great on here, nor is there a lot of interest from the developers to improve them.

        Most moderators rely on bots and scripts. I myself have written bash scripts to fetch all reports from instances using alts because reports don’t federate.

        • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I imagine lemmy should have a whole RPG system to tag and sort not just by mods but by community feedback too. Basically an extension of up or downvoting that adds useful tags.

        • Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Interesting, we also have the same thing where reports and private messages to bots are crawled to a specified matrix chat to keep track of things.

    • cadekat@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s a ridiculous rationale. If the Lemmy developers actually cared about the integrity of users’ posts, they wouldn’t have released software without support for cryptographic signing.