• skyline2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Bravo Michael for continuing to farm bullshit drama with clickbait headlines on the most inane topics like “how my DE handles pasting text”

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You mean “once again”. They had one, but screwed it up. Who the fuck types in the file save dialog expecting it to perform SEARCH?

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not having that in Windows is jarring.

    I don’t use GNOME or Firefox though so maybe who cares.

    • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The default paste action is pretty much the only thing preventing anyone from picking a different function for the button. That’s the the biggest reason for reversing the default behaviour.

  • Reisen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    as someone new to linux i don’t get it. if you have your hand in ctrl-c anyway ctrl-v is right there?

    • Chamomile 🐑@furry.engineer
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      @Reisen Among other things, it’s useful in terminals where the standard ctrl-c/ctrl-v send a control signal rather than copy/paste. Most terminals nowadays have some other copy/paste shortcut so it’s less important now, but a lot of us still find it convenient.

    • everett@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s like a second, separate clipboard. You “copy” text to this one by simply selecting it, then “paste” from it by middle-clicking.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      From the other thread it seems it’ll just be disabled by default, and enableable if wanted

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same, and I have done so since the mid-90’s. It’s muscle memory at this point.

      • mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        never even knew that was a thing until a couple months ago, found it by accident. for 15-ish years I’ve just used a programmable mouse button for paste. still don’t know what i should do with that button now since middle click can paste.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        From the other thread it seems it’ll just be disabled by default, and enableable if wanted

        • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, the title of this post seems to make that fairly clear. Still annoying though.

          • vandsjov@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Maybe GNOME and Mozilla will consider a separate download/package where it is enabled by default, like gnome-desktop-middle-click-to-paste-enabled :D

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sure but youre probably aware that the vast majority of users dont, and for those users its a usability issue.

      • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you’re referring to touch screen users, then I don’t see how not having copy/pasting work when you plug in a mouse benefits them normally when they don’t have mice plugged in.

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well, I guess I’d have to use a fork of… oh, wait a second, I’ve already been alternating between Pale Moon, SeaMonkey, LibreWolf, and Firefox along with Tor and Links.

    I just would be using less of Firefox and more of LibreWolf. And when Ladybird is ready, I’ll use that and dillo.

    • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Except Ladybird is ran by a right wing guy 😞

      I’d suggest looking at Servo or old KHTML if you want a true alternative

      • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m still looking forward to a new browser engine, separate from Chrome and Gecko. The politics can be debated later, but we need something to break the Google stranglehold. Let’s just be real about this, KHTML, Dillo, Links, and Goanna aren’t doing it. Opera & Vivaldi aren’t going to resurrect Presto.

        So what then, other than Ladybird?

          • N.E.P.T.R@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Waterfox is Gecko. I still agree with the comment that mentions it is written by a right-winger. I rather root for Servo, especially because Ladybird is just another web engine written C. Memory safety vulnerabilities are the largest represented class of vulnerabilities discovered every year. Servo being fully written in Rust is a good thing for its security, as long as they also design a strong sandboxing/isolation strategy on all OS platforms.

            • Libb@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              You do you, that’s fine with me. Waterfox is still an option for other people to consider when they’re looking for an alternative. Like I would consider any new option that presents itself to me: I’m not married to my browser, at least in my eyes it is merely a tool :)

              • N.E.P.T.R@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I tried Waterfox and didnt really get it? Why use it over for example Zen or Librewolf? It just seemed way to close to Firefox but like with a couple of preinstalled extensions. Idk, just wasn’t for me.

                My browser(s) is just a tool. I use many browsers for different things. I wish there were good alternatives to the main browser engines (Gecko, Blink, WebKit), but I am fine with just using good derivative browsers like Librewolf, Mullvad, Cromite, etc.

  • DiabeticNomad@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Didn’t know if it was possible for open source to disappoint me, but here we are. Instead of removing it entirely make it an option so the people can decide.

    • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There are programs that use the middle mouse button but also support pasting from clipboard. I’ve been annoyed at work plenty of times when I’m trying to translate across a canvas but accidentally paste a random node of text. Bonus points if it contains some kind of password that was still in your clipboard. I don’t think it’s a good default.

    • Barry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It can conflict with some programs. A lot of modern design programs make use of middle click drags to move around a canvas.

      That caused problems for me and it took me days to realize it was middle click paste causing the issue of all these random segments of text appearing all over the canvas.

      It was also annoying to disable. I was using Chromium at the time and you simply cannot disable it, even by disabling it in Gnome. I had to use Firefox exclusively when using that design program since at least Firefox has a hidden option to disable it.

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      My mouse’s middle click is easy to hit accidentally, and so I often paste stuff on accident, I just wish I could disable it. The “select to copy” doesn’t work for me either, since I often absentmindedly select things while I’m reading.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think I’d happily describe the multiple clipboard situation in Linux as a dumpster fire…

      It’s awkwardly ‘solved’ by clipboard managers merging clipboards but it’s still wonky. Even for somebody who has been using Linux as a desktop for many years I occasionally find myself annoyed by it.

      At this point I think I’d prefer “copy” to be an affirmative action rather than something that is done automatically. It makes pasting over existing text much easier.

      • mech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah the 2 clipboards are a mess.
        I actually once locked me out of ALL my accounts because of them.

  • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    As someone who likes the middle-click to do mouse relative scrolling, I would be OK with this being configurable on a per-application level.

    I don’t think it really makes sense as a “standard”. Blender will never use middle click as paste, for example.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Middle click to paste the X PRIMARY selection predates Blender.

      Yes, I do know how old Blender is.

      • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Right,

        But just because it was a standard doesn’t mean it made sense as a standard. So when 99% of applications don’t care to adopt the standard, it really only makes sense to let the application space decide what to do with middle click and to fall back on the user’s system configuration if it’s unspecified (which can still be paste if you want it to be imo)

  • Zeoic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ill be very happy when that day comes. Its one of the first things I need to search for how to disable every time i setup a new machine. To me, middle click has always been panning a canvas, and rectangle selecting text in editors. Its always super jarring having it paste text on new gnome machines

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      wait where does that get overridden? its going back a few years but when I was trying blender I used middle click paste and I don’t think I had any issues with it affecting whatever middle click does by default in blender

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Middle click paste sucks, I keep accideE&4nry!NAnY6Yfntally activating it in the middle of my documents which is bad when I have st6SFMzZkTR7!b^yuff like passwords copied and don’t notice, so good

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      KDE and Gnome already have toggles for it, though Gnome’s is in gnome-tweaks because Gnome hates exposed settings.

      I’d support unifying behavior between toolkits and apps to provide users with a single point to set their preference, but I use this feature a hundred times a day. I’d also like it to remain the default; *nix desktops should have their own flavor instead of just copying Mac OS or Windows, and middle-click paste has been a part of that flavor for 40 years.