Now I need to take a loan in order to afford 32gb for replacement thanks to the ai bros hoarding all the chips…

Tried on three different PCs, both Intel and AMD, both sticks are damaged, somehow

  • tal@lemmy.todayEnglish
    0·
    20 days ago

    Ah, fair enough. Long shot, but thought I’d at least mention it on the off chance that maybe it would work and maybe you hadn’t yet tried it. Sorry.

    tries to think of anything else that could be done

    Are you using Linux? Linux has a patch that was added many years back with the ability to map around damaged regions in memory. I mean, if your memory is completely hosed and you can’t even boot the kernel, then that won’t work, but if you can identify specific areas that fail, you can hand that off to the kernel and it can just avoid them. Obviously decreases usable memory by a certain amount, but…shrugs

    I’ve never needed to do it myself, but let me go see if I can find some information. Think it was the “badram” feature.

    searches

    Okay. You’re running memtest86. It looks like that has the ability to generate the string you need, and you hand that off to GRUB, which hands it off to the kernel.

    https://www.memtest86.com/blacklist-ram-badram-badmemorylist.html

    MemTest86 Pro (v9 or later) supports automatic generation of BadRAM string patterns from detected errors in the HTML report, that can be used directly in the GRUB2 configuration without needing to manually calculate address/mask values by hand.

    To enter the address ranges to blacklist manually, do the following:

    Edit /etc/default/grub and add the following line:

    GRUB_BADRAM=addr,mask[,addr,mask...]

    where the list of addr,mask pairs specify the memory range to block using address bit matching Eg. GRUB_BADRAM=0x7ddf0000,0xffffc000 shall exclude the memory range 0x7DDF0000-0x7DDF4000 Open and terminal and run the following command

    sudo update-grub

    Reboot the system

    If you can’t even boot the system sufficiently to get update-grub to run, then you might need to do a fancier dance (swap drive to another machine or something), but that’s probably a good first thing to try. I’d try booting to “rescue mode” or whatever if your distro has an option like that in GRUB, something that doesn’t start the graphical environment, as it’ll touch less memory.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      0·
      20 days ago

      wow i’m running linux, so it might be perfect

      though i’m a bit scared that it will get worse over time. Today i got a freeze that forced me to test the ram with memtest86, but since september i got some random corruption in the btrfs filesystem (luckily always “useless” files like flatpak or docker stuff that i could delete and download again in seconds) and i assumed it was a btrfs bug, not hardware problem

      • chellomere@lemmy.worldEnglish
        0·
        20 days ago

        You can even make linux run an automatic memtest on boot and reserve the bad areas it finds. This is with the memtest=N kernel parameter, where N is the number of passes. memtest=17 tests all patterns. With this, the kernel will run an automatic test on every boot.

      • COASTER1921@lemmy.mlEnglish
        0·
        20 days ago

        If I were in this position I’d strongly consider using 16GB for the next year or two. Especially with an NVME SSD, good swap performance makes the impact of running out of memory much smaller than it used to be.

        It’s very strange both sticks failed at the same time, have you tried them in another motherboard?

      • justlemmyin@lemmy.worldEnglish
        0·
        20 days ago

        I had to do this on my busted ddr4 2 weeks ago. Badram didn’t work, but memmap did. I had to do bit flipping to get the translation from BADRAM as explained here.

        I think the latest memtest86+ has the option to report in memmap format. But you will need to take a photo of the screen, coz it’s Foss and not as fancy as Passmarks memtest.

        Edit: Adding badram to grub broke grub for me, I have to undo the grub config using a live boot rescue thingamajig. Then I went hunting why.

    • MigratingApe@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      0·
      20 days ago

      doubt that there are a lot of systems with damaged memory floating around.

      Let’s say that you would be surprised if we actually started checking this. I will not disclose my occupation but there are thousands of critical telco infrastructure pieces of equipment that run not only a non-ECC ram because of cost cutting, but with actually broken DRAM modules, regularly rebooting at least a few times a day and causing local outages…

      Back to the topic at hand - doesn’t it seem strange that only CPU4 finds issues in memtest86? It could be a CPU or even motherboard that got damaged and not the DRAM itself, no?

      • tal@lemmy.todayEnglish
        0·
        20 days ago

        Back to the topic at hand - doesn’t it seem strange that only CPU4 finds issues in memtest86? It could be a CPU or even motherboard that got damaged and not the DRAM itself, no?

        I noticed that, but OP said that he ran the thing in three different systems, so I’m assuming that he’s seen the same problems with multiple CPUs. It may be — I don’t know — that memtest86 doesn’t, at least as he’s running it, necessarily try to hit each byte of memory with each CPU, or at least that the order it does so doesn’t have errors from other CPUs visible.

        I also wondered if it might be a 13th or 14th gen Intel CPU, the ones that destroyed themselves over time. But (a) it’s a mobile CPU, and only the desktop CPUs had the problem there, and (b) it’s 11th gen.