• Ferk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Ah, I see. I think I interpreted that differently than you did.

    I assumed the ambiguous section would be part of the demands done to the ones who do implement the detection (which are the ones that potentially introduce security risks and risks of other kinds, like privacy breaches), not the ones who don’t implement it.

    I think we would need to actually see the text of the proposal to see where is that expression used that she’s referring to.

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Ah, i see. Ye it can be interpreted in different ways, and reading the proposal might clear it up, but i doubt it. Its written extremely vague on purpose