I got a random graph from the internet. It’s for illustrative purposes mainly. It’s a pretty widely known fact that image generation is more resource intensive than text generation.
Because it’s besides the point. As things stand currently GenAI isn’t as bad as people make it out to be, and unless video (specifically) takes off it won’t be.
No, it is. That’s because Alphabet, Meta and every internet giant are pushing it to become mainstream, not because it’s currently is. People who just Google something are in the billions, they use this crap daily several times a day, without any concerns about environmental impacts, all this while some enshitification of useful services is due to keep up with the AI losses. That’s not desirable nor responsible.
Source? Also seems like anything over image is too much. Again, it’s the same companies doing both, is it not?
I got a random graph from the internet. It’s for illustrative purposes mainly. It’s a pretty widely known fact that image generation is more resource intensive than text generation.
Here’s a news article that mentions it for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mJLTOs5i44
I notice you keep ignoring my one point. Is it not the same companies doing image generation as well as all the rest?
Because it’s besides the point. As things stand currently GenAI isn’t as bad as people make it out to be, and unless video (specifically) takes off it won’t be.
No, it is. That’s because Alphabet, Meta and every internet giant are pushing it to become mainstream, not because it’s currently is. People who just Google something are in the billions, they use this crap daily several times a day, without any concerns about environmental impacts, all this while some enshitification of useful services is due to keep up with the AI losses. That’s not desirable nor responsible.