• Morphit @feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    Magnetic Resonance Angiogram. Yeah it’s an MRI. I guess they’re processing it somehow to enhance bloodflow like FMRI. Seems like it doesn’t require contrast.

    • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Radiologist here. 👋🏻

      You are right it does not require contrast. The scan uses a special technique to reduce signal from tissue that isn’t moving so only things that are moving produce high signal and show up “bright.” Since blood is the only thing really moving in the brain - voila!

      • Morphit @feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Neat, I was thinking it was something like motion amplification. I guess the lungs would mess with imaging of the torso, or can you pick the motion frequency to isolate bloodflow but ignore respiration?

        • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          The lung motion is be a problem but it is still done in some situations and the radiologist just tries their best with any motion artifacts. Since the blood vessels are so big in the chest it kind of works out, but it turns out better with contrast.

          • Morphit @feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            I see. I started reading this article which describes a whole host of different techniques. It really seems to be exploiting the physics of NMR to get this enhancement (or deficit), along with the image processing. It’s really interesting but I’d need a while to get my head around it.