• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well, my point is that it’s already largely irrelevant what they do. Many of their talented engineers have moved on to other companies, some new startups and some already-established ones. The interesting new models and products are not being produced by OpenAI so much any more.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if “safety alignment” is one of the reasons, too. There are a lot of folks in tech who really just want to build neat things and it feels oppressive to be in a company that’s likely to lock away the things they build if they turn out to be too neat.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Many of their talented engineers have moved on to other companies, some new startups and some already-established ones.

      When did this happen? I know some of the leadership departed but I hadn’t heard of it from the rank and file.

      I’m not saying necessarily that you’re wrong; definitely it seems like something has changed between the days of GPT-3 and GPT-4 up until the present day. I just hadn’t heard of it.

      There are a lot of folks in tech who really just want to build neat things and it feels oppressive to be in a company that’s likely to lock away the things they build if they turn out to be too neat.

      I’m not sure this is true for AI. Some of the people who are most worried about AI safety are the AI engineers. I have some impression that OpenAI’s safety focus was why so many people liked working for them, back when they were doing groundbreaking work.