• jounniy@ttrpg.networkOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    No I don’t want to play RAW. I just don’t want in game solutions to out of game problems. Just (and I know that this will seem extremely absurd, but hear me out!) talk to your players about it like a normal person and make it clear before you start to play.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I mean it’s tongue-in-cheek, and it’s never really been a problem at my table. Just a fun way to remind casters not to argue about specific wording interpretations in spells, and take them as their most obvious meaning

      Now, if a caster comes up with something clever, they can make an Intelligence (Persuasion) check to see if Mystra will allow something. Just don’t tell Mystra how her own body works

      • jounniy@ttrpg.networkOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Okay. But do you actually allow any use of the spell that’s not as originally intended? Because some things are technical applications of the rules which rely on rules working as intended but still in very specific way without breaking the game at all.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Sure. The line is somewhere between “I cast minor illusion to make an image of a cabinet, and hide inside of it” and “I cast Shape Water to freeze that guy’s blood.” In the former case, the spell never says I can’t hide inside the illusory object. Clever, useful, not game-breaking. In the latter case, the spell says a creature can’t be inside the water, but it never says the water can’t be inside the creature! Bad, shame, you lose all your spell slots until the next long rest