tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agoWhat prevailing theory in scientific circles do you think is likely to be replaced with a new understanding by 2050?message-squaremessage-square40linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1message-squareWhat prevailing theory in scientific circles do you think is likely to be replaced with a new understanding by 2050?tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square40linkfedilink
minus-squarelattrommi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoOh, well that’s good to know. Thanks! I guess I need to update my own knowledge of what prevailing thought is.
minus-squareblackbrook@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoDid you really think that what you were able to infer from basic knowledge about the motion of the planets was not realized by scientists?
minus-squarelattrommi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoI did not think it was a prevailing theory. Now I’m curious about what you wanted to accomplish by asking that question. Why would it matter either way?
Oh, well that’s good to know. Thanks! I guess I need to update my own knowledge of what prevailing thought is.
Did you really think that what you were able to infer from basic knowledge about the motion of the planets was not realized by scientists?
I did not think it was a prevailing theory. Now I’m curious about what you wanted to accomplish by asking that question. Why would it matter either way?