• Dae@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Music artists absolutely fucking hate music streaming services! It’s too big to not participate, and in a lot of cases, their record label won’t let them not do so. But the pay is absolute shit! If you care about tbe artist behind the music, buy their music. If you don’t want to have all your music stored on device because it takes too much room, there are self-host options.

    Going solely with streaming is actively screwing artists over, especially in the case of Spotify, which pays out to the tune (pun intended) of 0.0001¢ per stream. Even an artist as well known as Weird Al barely makes enough to buy a sandwich from what Spotify pays! Other platforms are better, but not by much. I don’t say this to guilt trip; many big names make good money from record deals and will be just fine, while most of us don’t make much. Indie artists are the real losers here.

    That said, music had gotten cheap! Most of your favorite indie artists will sell FLAC versions of their albums for $10 an album, or $1 a song on Bandcamp, and prices are between $10-20 for major artists on platforms like Qobuz. It might take time to build your library back up, but the average person can make a huge difference here by taking the money you would spend on Spotify or any other platform, and buying your music directly. You’d be paying the artist more than they’d get from you streaming nothing but their album every day all year, eventually you’ll be paying less in the long run by not being subbed to a greedy music platform, and you’ll get better quality!

  • pewpew@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can’t ungoogle myself this time. YT music has probably the best catalog of all and it’s easily moddable

  • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If you’re paying for music, stay away from any music publisher that doesn’t give you the option of keeping a DRM-free copy for yourself that can be played back in perpetuity, unconditionally.

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I tend to wear a special hat that allows me to consume music in any format or device I like.

    and then go donate to, or purchase music directly from the artists that I like.

  • Psythik@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Which one has the biggest selection and highest quality audio, ad-free for $0/mo?

    I use YouTube Music ReVanced, and while the audio quality isn’t the highest (because it’s YouTube), you can’t beat the song selection. Especially when it’s free and ad-free.

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      You’re likely violating the YouTube terms of service and can be banned at any moment. Also you’re stealing from musicians. Lemmy has multiple piracy communities that can probably give you more options

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        “Stealing” from billionaire record industry executives, you mean. Artists make the vast majority of their income from merch, autograph signings, and ticket sales. I couldn’t care less if a billionaire executive misses out on a few hundred bucks from me over my lifetime. And secondly, making a copy isn’t stealing.

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Spotify has no music. I don’t like it.

        (Seriously, it’s missing so many songs! But thanks anyway.)

  • lemmyknow@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    No Qobuz on Linux afaik :(

    I’d otherwise consider the switch

    Though being part of a family plan, I’d either have to pay for it myself – an added cost to expenses – or somehow get whole family to move over.

    I wonder also how they be with people living separately

    • RustedSnail@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I had no problem using Qobuz on Linux (firefox and chrome based browsers); unless you are mean you were expecting a separate app or something.

      • lemmyknow@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, I guess that could work. Downside is my browser isn’t exactly set to remember stuff. Not sure if it’s the cookies or what exactly. Having to log in every time I reopen my browser would maybe be a tad annoying, but I guess I could do it (especially with Bitwarden’s autofill making log in quicker and more convenient)

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Naspers is a South African multinational internet, technology and multimedia holding company headquartered in Cape Town… did you mean Napster…? Did you generate this with AI or something?

    Why would the largest music streaming service in the world be in the “other” category and not the “Big Tech Incumbents”.

    • stellargmite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeh and the blurb for splotifry reads like an ad, with not a negative word to say about this exploitative monster.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I mean, the “To Note” section includes information about their worse practices. The whole infographic is such a nonsense mishmash.

  • thesmokingman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Tidal is owned by Block, the owners of Square, which is the biggest POS vendor in the US. If that’s not big tech I don’t know what is.

    • nfreak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Part of the reason I just shifted to a fully self-hosted setup.

      Left Spotify because of all the bullshit they pull, tried out Tidal because of the higher quality and higher artist pay, but even if it is a substantially better platform, its ownership is questionable to say the least.

      I dusted off bandcamp and learned to use slskd to build a full local high quality library powered by a Navidrome instance.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve been happy with Bandcamp. They got sold recently so their future is uncertain, but I downloaded all the music I bought.

    They don’t really have an algorithm, but you can see who else purchased something, and they do blog posts about like “what’s new in [genre]” that’s worth reading. So far as I can tell it’s written by real people.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They also have regular “Bandcamp Fridays”, where they forego their 25% and give musicians 100% of proceeds for the day. It’s a good chance to directly support small artists.

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, from the conversations I’ve had, they’re kind of the best of a bad bunch, all things considered.