• cannedtuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Might read past the headline.

      Another “very drunk” woman was filmed rubbing her behind against the screen, while a different video shows a man

      One person on the Irish side went as far as to show the New Yorkers images of 9/11 on his phone

      Probably wasn’t the only time. People generally being people is probably why they shut it down.

  • WhatIsThePointAnyway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m sure this was killed by bitchy socially conservative sheltering types who freak out about anything that doesn’t fit in their small minded view of morality.

        • WhatIsThePointAnyway@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          No one forces you to stare at the girl. People see offensive shit every day all over, but society doesn’t conform to all offenses equally, does it? Why is your ethics enforceable, but other people’s aren’t? Why does she have less right to practice her ethical choice to expose her body (assuming by your answer you would have offense)? Why is it more ethical to have others right to view taken away than for you to simply turn your head away? Ethics is very subjective, especially when there is no direct harm to either party.

          • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            It is against the law. That means that society, as a whole, has decided that this is immoral.

            No one forces you to stare at the girl

            So that means that its morally okay to kill everyone who looks at me (“No one forces then to look at me!”)?

            Why is your ethics enforceable, but other people’s aren’t?

            Because ethics are only enforcable through laws and the laws currently enforce “my” ethics in that regard.

            Why does she have less right to practice her ethical choice to expose her body (assuming by your answer you would have offense)?

            Whether that is morally right is an ethical question but would you say the same about a minor (exposing themselves)?

            Ethics is very subjective

            Exactly, so what is the issue with the company having moral concerns about it and shutting it down?

      • chakan2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I wouldn’t say terrified. There’s these things called dignity and respect. NYC gave up on those a long time ago.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Here’s the thing. If people aren’t allowed to have fun with your intercontinental portal, why even have it at all?