• idiomaddict@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Afaik, Americans use about 20% of the world’s resources with about 4% of the population. China and India both do use a lot of resources, but they’re also a third of the world’s population

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yes, but when taking regional inequality in account, the picture becomes clearer. There are regions in both China and India where the per capital consumption is nearly as bad as in the US.

      • idiomaddict@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Certainly, but those are the wealthy regions, which don’t really fit into the “developing” stage anymore imo. They’re more developed than the (mainland) UK was when the terminology became common.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, but in a hypothetical world where Mexico was part of the US, the per capital consumption of the US would also look much better on paper.

          • idiomaddict@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I think we agree, lol. Richer areas use more resources and poorer areas use fewer. It’s not 1:1, but it’s pretty close.

      • idiomaddict@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Does that matter? It’s not an attack on Americans: Europeans, Japanese people and South Koreans also use more than their fair share, along with many other countries, roughly correlated with wealth.