Back in 2016, WikiLeaks was in direct communication with Trump Jr. and telling the campaign to claim the election was rigged and stolen if he lost. He was pulling a lot of stuff behind the scenes outside of the scope of journalism. It’s clear Assange was likely a mouthpiece for Russia to sow division in the US during this period.
You say he was not a journalist, but we’ve never seen good evidence of this. At worst, he was a bad journalist.
Anyway, maybe Democratic presidents and candidates could have considered the impact of their actions on his life. Did they think he would be sympathetic to them, after all they did or failed to do? This is common sense.
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
“She did it. Maybe without meaning to, but she did do it.”
I’ve seen interviews a year or two after where he’s said he doesn’t regret it because it was important to address it due to her basically expecting to win.
Not sure if he still holds that to this day though seeing the fustercluck we’ve got.
It didn’t help that two weeks before the election the director of the FBI was like “I think we should investigate her lol”
You can lay that directly at the feet of Assange
You could, if you ignore history. Assange didn’t make anyone investigate anything. He was a journalist with no special powers.
Back in 2016, WikiLeaks was in direct communication with Trump Jr. and telling the campaign to claim the election was rigged and stolen if he lost. He was pulling a lot of stuff behind the scenes outside of the scope of journalism. It’s clear Assange was likely a mouthpiece for Russia to sow division in the US during this period.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/11/14/563996442/donald-trump-jr-had-direct-contact-with-wikileaks-during-campaign
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/how-the-russians-hacked-the-dnc-and-passed-its-emails-to-wikileaks/2018/07/13/af19a828-86c3-11e8-8553-a3ce89036c78_story.html
You say he was not a journalist, but we’ve never seen good evidence of this. At worst, he was a bad journalist.
Anyway, maybe Democratic presidents and candidates could have considered the impact of their actions on his life. Did they think he would be sympathetic to them, after all they did or failed to do? This is common sense.
And then took it back two days after the election. I wonder what James Comey makes of himself in hindsight.
No, they didn’t take it back, they did investigate her and they did find the exact thing people said they would find.
The country probably would have been better off with her at the helm.
But the “claims” were accurate.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
“She did it. Maybe without meaning to, but she did do it.”
I’ve seen interviews a year or two after where he’s said he doesn’t regret it because it was important to address it due to her basically expecting to win.
Not sure if he still holds that to this day though seeing the fustercluck we’ve got.
He’s an institutionalist robot who thinks it was the right thing to do because that’s what the rules told him to do.