I’ve seen interviews a year or two after where he’s said he doesn’t regret it because it was important to address it due to her basically expecting to win.
Not sure if he still holds that to this day though seeing the fustercluck we’ve got.
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
“She did it. Maybe without meaning to, but she did do it.”
And then took it back two days after the election. I wonder what James Comey makes of himself in hindsight.
I’ve seen interviews a year or two after where he’s said he doesn’t regret it because it was important to address it due to her basically expecting to win.
Not sure if he still holds that to this day though seeing the fustercluck we’ve got.
He’s an institutionalist robot who thinks it was the right thing to do because that’s what the rules told him to do.
No, they didn’t take it back, they did investigate her and they did find the exact thing people said they would find.
The country probably would have been better off with her at the helm.
But the “claims” were accurate.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
“She did it. Maybe without meaning to, but she did do it.”