• snor10@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Our current system of copyright is flawed and only serves the interests of corporations.

  • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think this logic is silly.

    Employers don’t own you, so witholding wages for services you provided isn’t stealing. Getting a haircut and not paying isn’t stealing.

    I think the better justification is: rights holders make it a pain in the arse to access content affordably, so fuck you, just going to steal it.

    • mineapple@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re only partly right. You example services. Of course it is not possible to own services. Piracy is only applicable to products. The point of the Twitter guy is, that companies intentionally stop selling their software etc. as products to sell you the same thing as a service, so that you cannot own it.

  • LeHappStick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here I am wondering why there is still a downvote button in the YouTube comments… it does nothing!

  • 𝔄𝔩𝔩𝔞𝔫@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m amused at these statements these ‘wannabe’ pirates make to justify piracy. A smart person would pirate quietly without letting the world know or justifying it.

    I know why I do it & I don’t want some validation, internet points, 2 minutes of fame to sound / look cool.

    • Compactor9679@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      “A smart person would pirate quietly without letting the world know” While posting “I do it & I don’t want some validation…”

      • TommySalami@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Theres some truth to this, but a lot of people do use this as a shield against the general cultural acceptance that piracy is stealing or otherwise morally underhanded. I do it, but I don’t have any illusion I’m one of the activists. I just get indignant and refuse to pay someone for content or entertainment who I think is damaging to the medium or predatory in general. I feel like if I really wanted to make a statement, I just wouldn’t consume their work at all – but life is short and I want to have my cake and eat it too.

        • Cabrio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s possible to do both, I consume plenty of pirated media simply because it’s unavailable due to pathetic capitalist imposed digital distribution limitations and lack of equitable paid access.

          I also consume other pirated media because I wouldn’t spend my resources for access because I don’t yet know the value of the content and won’t pay just for an opportunity to be disappointed, been there enough times to have learned that lesson. I’m happy to spend my time to find out your media sucks, but not my money, because that’s also my time with the addition that I’ve put actual effort into converting it into fungible assets.

          I also deliberately pirate media that I would pay for and do understand the value of, both because I can’t always afford to purchase said product from a company making billions of dollars in exploitative corporate profits and because I have no interest in caring about that over my own personal satisfaction in life.