Drew@sopuli.xyz to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works · 4 days agoBelchingsopuli.xyzimagemessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageBelchingsopuli.xyzDrew@sopuli.xyz to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works · 4 days agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-squarefibojoly@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-23 days agoShould be age > (my_age / 2) +7
minus-squareolafurp@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoFound the programmer thread that criticises the data model instead of the t-shirt
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoOr (my_age - 7) * 2 < age < (my_age / 2) +7`
minus-squarefibojoly@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoUh, no no. The rule is “half my age plus seven”. I’ve no idea what your other term is supposed to represent.
minus-squareji17br@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoHe’s saying it goes both ways. The upper limit is a women who you would be half her age plus 7.
minus-squareabsGeekNZ@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoThis “rule” only works for a small set of ages from 14 ~ 30ish If you are 14 then the range for “age” is 14 - 14 If you are 30 then the range for “age” is 22 - 46 If you are 40 then the range for “age” is 27 - 66 At 30 the upper level is 16 years different; while it could work it is a big gap to bridge. It only gets worse the older you get.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoWhy would there be an age and my_age column on the table GIRLS?
minus-squarejol@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoBecause for each girl you meet, you might tell her a different age.
minus-squarelennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoGood point. Should be age > (@my_age / 2) +7 FTFOP - now my age is some value defined outside the immediate query. More likely, the GIRLS would be a view of some table persons and you could query my_age from that table too.
minus-squarefibojoly@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-23 days agoThank you. I assumed the reader would be educated enough to guess I meant a variable. But yeah, should used @my_age
minus-squarelennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·24 hours agoPretty sure “People who know enough about SQL to know about variables” is a subset of “People who know enough about SQL to be pedantic about it” :p
Should be
age > (my_age / 2) +7
Found the programmer thread that criticises the data model instead of the t-shirt
Or (my_age - 7) * 2 < age < (my_age / 2) +7`
Uh, no no. The rule is “half my age plus seven”. I’ve no idea what your other term is supposed to represent.
He’s saying it goes both ways. The upper limit is a women who you would be half her age plus 7.
This “rule” only works for a small set of ages from 14 ~ 30ish
If you are 14 then the range for “age” is 14 - 14
If you are 30 then the range for “age” is 22 - 46
If you are 40 then the range for “age” is 27 - 66
At 30 the upper level is 16 years different; while it could work it is a big gap to bridge. It only gets worse the older you get.
Why would there be an age and my_age column on the table GIRLS?
Because for each girl you meet, you might tell her a different age.
Good point.
FTFOP - now my age is some value defined outside the immediate query.
More likely, the GIRLS would be a view of some table persons and you could query
my_age
from that table too.Thank you. I assumed the reader would be educated enough to guess I meant a variable. But yeah, should used @my_age
Pretty sure “People who know enough about SQL to know about variables” is a subset of “People who know enough about SQL to be pedantic about it” :p