• KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    LLMs are incredibly bad at any math because they just predict the most likely answer, so if you ask them to generate a random number between 1 and 100 it’s most likely to be 47 or 34. Because it’s just picking a selection of numbers that humans commonly use, and those happen to be the most statistically common ones, for some reason.

    doesn’t mean that it won’t try, it’ll just be incredibly wrong.

          • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m here for LLM’s responding that 42 is the answer to life, the universe and everything, just because enough people said the same.

            • oo1@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              42 would have been statistically the most likely answer among the original humans of earth, until our planet got overrun with telehone sanitizers, public relations executives and management consultants.

        • xantoxis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s how the AI ended up with the same answer. They don’t make up their own answers you know, they’re copying things humans said.

          • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            It’s almost like that is exactly what KillingTime said two parent comments ago…

          • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            A well-known mentalism “trick” from David Blaine was when he’d ask someone to “Name a two digit number from 1 to 50; make each digit an odd digit, but use different digits”, and his guess would be 37. There are only eight values that work {13, 15, 17, 19, 31, 35, 37, 39}, and 37 was the most common number people would choose. Of course, he’d only put the clips of people choosing 37. (He’d mix it up by asking for a number between 50 and 100, even digits, different digits, and the go-to number was 68 iirc.)

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because it’s just picking a selection of numbers that humans commonly use, and those happen to be the most statistically common ones, for some reason.

      The reason is probably dumb, like people picking a common fraction (half or a third) and then fuzzing it a little to make it “more random”. Is the third place number close to but not quite 25 or 75?

    • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Me: Pick a number between 1 and 100

      Gemini: I picked a number between 1 and 100. Is there anything else I can help you with?