• Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Dealing with Linux for 2 decades doesn’t make you and expert in modern Linux. It just makes you old.

    Even leaving Linux for a few years means that you get behind. I had to explain to a coworker what Wayland was because he hasn’t used Linux in years.

    If WSL works for you that’s great but here are the issues I’ve had

    • weird networking issues where Windows can access Linux but Linux can not access Windows without lots of work.

    • any advanced networking like VPN’s will not work

    • It is slow and requires working virtualization

    • Filesystem sharing is not as easy as I would like

    • It is a bit finicky to get working and requires a bunch of disk space and resources.

    Meanwhile native Linux doesn’t have these issues and git bash/cygwin is almost native in the sense that it has little overhead. Architectural perspective Cygwin is a lot like Wine. It just translates Linux calls to Windows ones.

    If you need Windows I would run it in a VM under Linux as that’s going to be a much better experience.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Without doxxing myself, I promise you I know more about linux than you do and I’m not saying windows is better, you silly fuck, I am saying it’s more stable. I don’t even recommend using either as a server when BSD is better at stability than both OS combined.