Like, we’ll probably find out that eating boogers actually makes you immune to select illnesses or something crazy like that.

  • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    We can’t predict it because we can’t possibly know everything. But unpredictably isn’t the same as randomness or implies nondeterministic behaviour.

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      If you are really interested, look into the uncertainty principle.

      At this point in science we are as convinced as is possible to be; that the universe is probabilistic in nature.

      • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        The uncertainty principle says what the limits are on our knowledge of a given scenario, not that the universe which is running the show has such a limit.

        • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Your argument is circular.

          In your view, determinism requires impossible perfect knowledge. It only seems probabilistic, because we can’t do the impossible.

          This is also not a technology problem. These are not limits we can overcome.

          • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            I’m saying ‘we’- humans, don’t enter in to it at all. Knowledge and prediction are human things. I’m saying they don’t apply to the universe itself which is what is running things. The state of things is what it is, irrespective of ourselves. We humans will never know enough to be able to predict perfectly, but that doesn’t mean the matter and nature aren’t running deterministicly.