It can produce 14 liters of water at 70 to 100°C per hour.
I never need to boil water really on the stove, fill a pot and let it boil for like spaghetti. But for like instant raman noodles, just adding the water in a bowl with it works perfectly fine.
I live in America and they aren’t the most common thing installed in kitchens
Is there an advantage of a kettle over instant 100°C water on tap? Couldn’t you just use it to make tea?
It depends how much boiling water you need per day. Unless you use a LOT it’s more efficient (cost/energy wise) to use a kettle. Plus there’s a significant upfront cost to install a boiling water tap. However, if you drink a shitload of tea, or use a lot of boiling water in cooking, it’s generally better to have the on tap option.
Americans will do anything except use an electric kettle
Most of us don’t drink tea. My wife does and we have an electric kettle. It’s fantastic.
I told my friend from Australia that I heated water for tea on the stove in a saucepan and she said it was barbaric
I enjoy my under sink instant hot water heater.
It can produce 14 liters of water at 70 to 100°C per hour.
I never need to boil water really on the stove, fill a pot and let it boil for like spaghetti. But for like instant raman noodles, just adding the water in a bowl with it works perfectly fine.
I live in America and they aren’t the most common thing installed in kitchens
Is there an advantage of a kettle over instant 100°C water on tap? Couldn’t you just use it to make tea?
It depends how much boiling water you need per day. Unless you use a LOT it’s more efficient (cost/energy wise) to use a kettle. Plus there’s a significant upfront cost to install a boiling water tap. However, if you drink a shitload of tea, or use a lot of boiling water in cooking, it’s generally better to have the on tap option.
Do the British heat their lower back with tea?
Yes.