Definition of independent for the purposes of this question: source is not owned by a for-profit corporation, is not financially backed by any billionaire (either directly or via foundation or nonprofit organization) and is not financed by any national government (even if run without oversight).

It can have any perceived bias or political leaning.

Edit: Just to add it has to be written in English.

  • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    No it’s not. That’s blatantly false. Stop fear mongering. Also barely any funding for NPR news proper comes from the federal government. It’s like 1%.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Its established by an act of congress. republicans have all 3 branches of government. NPR is perceived to have a left leaning bias. republicans have repeatedly wanted to dismandle public institutions like education. trump want to dissole the department of education. What makes you think they wont just dissolve NPR? You have too much faith in government.

      • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Did you not read the part where I said that only 1% of their funding comes from the federal government?

        Also republicans won all 3 branches back in 2016 and threatened the same bullshit, but never followed through. I assume you read the clickbait news headline about marjory greene being quoted railing on NPR from a day or two ago? I wouldn’t put too much stock into that.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          Oh they’re not cutting the funding. They are undoing the act of congress that first established NPR.

          Also the 2nd term is not like the first term. You see how his cabinet picks got crazier? I mean, a pedophile for AG and a science denier for FDA?

          This isn’t like the first term, the guardrails are off.

          • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            Idk what to say. I’m also scared. But saying they’re losing funding January 20th isn’t true. As of now they aren’t. And I don’t think they will. I hope I’m right.