• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Does killing the billionaire solve anything though? The system will just put some other stooge in his position instead. Systemic change is the only way to solve this.

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Didn’t the revolution spiral out of hand, allowing Napoleon to seize power and crown himself emperor, leading to a series of wars that killed millions of people?

          • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Not since the Third Republic. But directly after Napoleon, power went back to the monarchy for like 50 years, so I’m not sure how much credit the guillotine deserves.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              A 50 year relapse to eradicate an infection that lasted for 1300 years ain’t bad.

              The reality is the French Revolution is why most of Europe is democratic now, it demonstrated more than anything else until the Russian Revolution that the “commoners” could not only win a war against the entrenched nobility, but that those nobles should be very, very fuckin scared of the idea and maybe get on board with the idea of a constitutional monarchy if nothing else.

    • Bye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Poison ivy would argue we don’t have time for systemic change. She’s doing what is in her power to do. She’d probably say that if your potted fern is droopy, it needs to be in the sun. But if you can’t afford a place with sun, maybe you need to do what you can now, and get a grow light.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        She’s doing what is in her power to do.

        …but her actions don’t actually achieve anything other than fulfilling some sort of revenge/punishment fantasy.

        The billionaire isn’t personally responsible for the emissions, and the companies will continue to operate without him. If we’re not talking systemic change (i.e. government-mandated, I guess?), then she needs to either target the businesses/facilities/supply chains directly, or convince the billionaire (or someone else with power in the companies) to change things.

          • Ledivin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            He’s not directly responsible - removing him from the equation doesn’t change anything. It’s not like he’s a machine and turning him off stops the emission. The companies will still run and nothing will have actually improved.