yes i did a os one but i am wondering what distros do you guys use and why,for me cachyos its fast,flexible,has aur(I loved how easy installing apps was) without tinkering.

  • MXX53@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Fedora 41 KDE at home on my daily driver laptop and desktop.

    Antix on my dell mini netbook.

    Multi machine VMs I manage at work run on red hat enterprise with no DE or WM.

    My web app servers at work run Ubuntu server 24 LTS with no DE or WM.

    My home lab runs on fedora 41 server, no DE or WM.

  • Ovata@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Been using Mint with the Cinnamon desktop environment for a few years now. Does everything I need it to.

  • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Artix because I love Arch and the AUR but networkd kept causing my home network to act like the mad hatter’s tea party with IP assignment.

  • hobbsc@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Bazzite for personal stuff because it looked neat and just worked after installation with a small learning curve. Due to interia I went with bluefin on the work computer for the same reasons

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I use Ubuntu because it’s the most popular and well-supported.

    I’m going to be switching to Mint because it’s basically a community-run fork of Ubuntu and I don’t trust Canonical anymore, but it’s hard to justify installing my OS from scratch considering I’ve been using Ubuntu since 2017.

    I recently ordered a Thinkpad T14 Gen1 with an R7 4750U, 16GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD and you better believe I’m going to be putting Mint on that as soon as I get it.

  • iDunnoBro@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Arch with KDE on ThinkPad T460s (studying and bullshit pc).

    Nobara with i3wm on home studio/gaming desktop. Switching to Arch on it one day but CBA at the moment.

    Honestly which distro I use isn’t all that important to me these days so long as I’m getting decently new kernel updates. Depending on my use case that’s not even important. Used Debian LTS on a home media center for probably 8 years.

  • hollerpixie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Mint. I used to distro hop so much and just got tired of having to reload everything. That was the last one I had done prior to having no more time to switch. 😅 Plus, it just works and it’s easy.

  • Icecreamface@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I use Debian. The current release has pretty up to date software. It’s super easy to install ( I don’t have as much time to fuck around with my OS as I used to). And it’s stable as fuck.

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Debian. Used to use others but realized they all just added crap I didn’t want, or could add myself with a simple script.

    I was a Slackware then Fedora, then Ubuntu as my daily drivers (whipe trying other distros, or Kali for specific purposes) before settling here.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Alpine:

    • Rolling release (Alpine Edge) yet stable
    • Extremely lightweight
    • Very customizable
    • After setting it up I find that it works very well
    • Decently sized repo
    • OpenRC rather then SystemD (I prefer the way it handles services)
    • Mwas alt (prob)@thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I wonder how hard is it to download apps on Glibc-free systems, On Systemd-free systems ik there is Flatpack and stuff , asking this bcs many apps on Linux only work on Glibc.

      • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I personally haven’t ran into any yet, tbh I have more issues with SystemD dependent apps (Also keep in mind Alpine packages and maintains apps in their repo so they don’t require GLIBs/SystemD)

  • Metju@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    2 flavors of Fedora with KDE on it:

    1. Aurora-DX for some dev work on the side. Once you get used to distroboxing / devcontainers, it’s rock-solid and mean dev environment (saw some minor issues with how certain GUI apps were scaled, but that’s about it).
    2. Nobara for gaming (tried Bazzite and it’d prolly work for that purpose as well).

    Unfortunately, had to keep Windows on one other machine (fuck you KORG for not providing anything working on Linux), but that’s limited to being a glorified music player now 😄

  • meathorse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Began moving all my hardware to Linux this year since none of them will run win11 without fk-about-ing - and I just don’t want to. So my server, media box and laptop are all cut over, only my main desktop left on windows a bit longer but it’s goose is cooked too.

    I’ve tried dozens of distros over the years but I’ve settled on Fedora KDE.

    The why:

    • Skipping x11 and head straight into Wayland so I don’t have to worry about that in the future.
    • I wanted something more up to date than debian-based and less cutting edge then Arch-based.
    • Stability and support of being in the RHEL family
    • Flatpaks
    • Tried to get on with gnome to get away from the ‘start menu’ paradigm but ended up getting on with kde better.
  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I’m currently using bazzite due to its really solid out of the box support for gaming hardware and peripherals.

    I’m really surprised everyone uses arch. I have three theories as to why:

    1. There actually aren’t that many arch uses but when arch users have the opportunity they won’t hesitate to say “BTW I use arch” were as others don’t really bother.
    2. There are lots of arch users and everyone uses it because they want to be able to say “BTW I use arch”
    3. (Very unlikly) There are lots of arch users and it’s because it’s actually a good distro that people like.

    (This is mostly a joke jsyk I’m sure arch is a great distro)

    • kureta@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      In my experience, the only quirk of arch is its installation. pacman and the AUR are great and I really did not have any issues with stability. First time I tried arch I used a tiling window manager, custom menu bars and all that “hackerman” stuff, which was not stable at all and forced me to reconfigure and tweak my machine all day every day. Now I am using a full blown Gnome desktop environment and it is rock stable. My only wish is to have an /etc directory just like Intel Clear Linux.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Different distros for different uses:

    • Debian with KDE for my casual servers and Docker boxes.
    • Nobara for my main gaming PC.
    • Linux Mint with Cinnamon for my general purpose PCs and my #JustWorks uses.
    • Arch for my pimp mobile test machines.