President-elect Donald Trump stunned the Pentagon and the broader defense world by nominating Fox News host Pete Hegseth to serve as his defense secretary, tapping someone largely inexperienced and untested on the global stage to take over the world’s largest and most powerful military.

Archive link

    • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t disagree, but that’s not really my point.

      What you’re arguing is basically akin to people who sat out the vote because “Genocide Joe”. Which is what gave America Trump 2.0 in the first place. Yes, the established Military Complex is flawed and in some cases downright evil. But the response to that isn’t “fuck it, let’s burn it down and give a fucking toddler direct control of it.”

      You don’t fix things by picking the worse option on purpose. That’s utter lunacy.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s not flawed, it’s been working exactly as it was intended our entire lives. Unless you were alive for WW2, the purpose of the military has been to spread misery and death. I’d call it one of the most evil institutions in the face of the Earth.

        I’m not optimistic. Trump won’t be allowed to destroy the military. He will weaken it, though, and that can only be a good thing.

        Hence, saving the world from the Pentagon.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Trump won’t be allowed to destroy the military. He will weaken it, though, and that can only be a good thing.

          Real 1930s Germany vibes coming out today

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’ve read a lot of stuff on the development of the military industrial complex in Germany and fascism’s relationship to it both while it was gaining power and had power and I’m not seeing any parallels, could you explain?

            • krashmo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              Fascism taking hold depends on a significant portion of people ignoring the threat it poses in its infancy. Saying Trump won’t do what he’s clearly trying to do, and even going so far as to say it might turn out to be a good thing, are both extremely bad ideas. Many Germans did not believe Hitler was the threat he turned out to be and as a consequence they did not react to his early actions as they would have had they known what was to come. Trump attempting to purge military leadership and install loyalists is an obvious example of an event that will come to be seen as a pivotal moment in history if we continue down this path we’re on.

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                Youre correct that there was a purge of military in Nazi Era Germany, but beyond that you kind of misunderstand the very collaborationist relationship that the nazis and the existing military industrial apparatus. I would really suggest reading The Economy and Class Structure of German Fascism by Alfred Sohn-Rethel for a little bit of a contextualization of why what you’re saying is kinda surface level analysis. Separately I’d recommend Fascism and Social Revolution by R. Palme Dutt.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        You don’t fix things by picking the worse option on purpose.

        That’s exactly what the electorate just did.

        That’s utter lunacy.

        I fully agree