IMHO, probably not; musk seems interested in his own finances, and on pitting people against minorities so that they don’t see him stealing from them.
IMHO, probably not; musk seems interested in his own finances, and on pitting people against minorities so that they don’t see him stealing from them.
Not directly addressing the crisis yesterday is just boneheaded. That’s my 2 cents. It’s a pandora’s box that will surprise us in many ways because we have no way of ascertaining what will exactly happen, and we also don’t know if or how it’s possible to reverse half of it.
Musk just being his usual recklessly optimistic self imo
Edit: but to answer your question, yes that is denialism, and I think anything short of actively boycotting the worst offenders in order to deprive lobbyists is denialism or indifference, but I always get called an asshole for thinking the onus should be partly on the consumer. But hey, we vote in progressives and they give us laws and suddenly the Escalade needs a frontal camera because it’s so big. That’s the world we live in, corporations have too much money and too much influence. If you wanna eat the rich it helps to starve them first imo