• goat@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    lol no it’s not. You can be a communist and not be a tankie. Tankies are hardly communists themselves.

    Tankies are authoritarians and defend authoritarianism. Do not use apologia.

    • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      You genuinely have never heard it used in a pejorative way against any red? I never said all commies were tankies. I explained the words etymology and then its subsequent broad (mis)application in current online parlance. Hope you’re not reading theory with those comprehension skills, comrade.

      • goat@sh.itjust.worksM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m not the one lacking in reading comprehension.

        Do you not believe that the tankies featured in this community are indeed tankies?

        • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          What I’m saying is that whilst actual Tankies did, and still do, exist you do not have to be one to be called one. It’s now become a catch-all slur applied well outside of its original target.

            • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              That’s really tickled me…

              Nice to see humour still exists out there. I can’t believe how all these (apparently) politically literate people (I think predominantly they’re Yanks) throw around these words: fascist, Tankies, liberal, libertarian, conservative etc with little precision. It’s a pity as all it does is stifle interactions - and no one will find common ground. Good way to keep the serfs under the cosh if they’re all bickering amongst themselves.