In a media availability held prior to the policy debates, Premier Smith suggested that she would honour the spirit but not the text of the CO2 resolution if it passed, continuing the government’s approach of supporting industry’s commitment to net zero by 2050.

It’s just nutrients, bruh

    • Oderus@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      13 days ago

      and voted in by bigger fucking knobs. These are the crazies Jason (the self-loathing gay) Kenney was referring to .

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOPEnglish
      0·
      13 days ago

      the problem is net zero has become a shorthand for ‘leave it in the ground,’ and that’s what our members are responding to, said Smith

      Lmao. Look at her, she’s actually beginning to understand what CO2 reduction actually means.

      “But just like I can go drink five litres of water and get water poisoning, too much CO2 is a detriment to the planet and it’s a detriment to the people,” Bieganek said to jeers from the audience. "

      sigh

      Beyond support for carbon capture, the Smith government hasn’t provided any firm details on how that target will be met. And during her morning keynote address, Smith reiterated her commitment to double oil and gas production.

      Remind me, again, how conservatives aren’t the problem.

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOPEnglish
      0·
      13 days ago

      Lol. Swing by the oilsands! That’s the future the conservatives want for us. Best part is it will, on the low end, take 200 bn to reclaim that mess. Good thing we’ve set aside 2 bn to do it.

      I love a good scenic vista… free of wind turbines

  • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
    0·
    13 days ago

    In other news, drowning isn’t real. You need water to live, how can too much water be a bad thing?

    Sponsored by Dasani.

    • NGnius@lemmy.caEnglish
      0·
      13 days ago

      You’d think with a name like conservatives, they would be all for conserving the environment…