• Leg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is always how I’ve chosen to interpret the expression. It’s not a theory. It’s an observation.

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s a thought experiment, not an observation. The idea is that if you have infinity and it’s truly random than eventually all possibilities emerge somewhere within that.

      The idea of infinite monkeys typing randomly on infinite typewriters is that eventually one of them would accidentally type out all the works of Shakespeare. Many more would type out parts of the works of Shakespeare. And many many many more would type random garbage.

      If we then take that forwadd imagine for a moment the multiverse is also infinite and random, then every possible universe would exist somewhere in that multiverse.

      It can be taken in other directions too. It’s a way of cocneptualising the implications of infinity and true randomness.

      Meanwhile actual Shakespeare had intelligence and wrote and created his works. Him being a monkey writing Shakespeare is just a sly humerous observation, but it has nothing to do with the actual meaning of the thought experiment and the idea it is trying to convey.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yeah, the point isn’t that they could write Shakespeare. But that they would write everything we could imagine + everything in between that.

        It tries to explain the concept of infinity. Which is mind boggling to any human.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Also since it should happen once, that means that it also happens an infinite number of times, but a smaller infinity than the whole infinity.

      • Leg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Did you choose to overlook my intentional usage of the word “chosen” just to mansplain something obvious? I did not make my choice out of ignorance, but I appreciate you assuming I did.