I’m getting sick every day at this Microsoft Windows slowness and bloat. I am trying to use as much Linux VMs as possible. I feel so unproductive on Windows. I also tried installing Linux on the office laptop. The problem is that Windows is officialy supported and the Linux is DYI. Once the IT departament changes it will sync up with Windows but Linux can be broken and you are no longer able to work. Next job I want to have full Linux laptop or at least Mac.

Besides:

  • Microsoft Office
  • Active Directory
  • Some proxy and VPN bullshit

Everything seems manageable and even better on Linux.

What is your experience?

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Most tech people actually use macs, because corporations prefer them for their tech employees, while the normal employees usually use Windows. Very few corps support linux on the desktop for their admins – even if their infrastructure is all on linux.

    • pathief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      You wish. Most tech companies will get you the cheapest laptop they can get away with.

      I remember being denied a 64bit laptop when developing a 64bit only application lol.

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I used to have a Linux laptop at work. I was even allowed to install my chosen distro. Then the IT department said “we don’t really know Puppet or how to manage Linux, but we know JAMF, so you’re all getting Macs now.”

      My job satisfaction has gone down since then. However, in more positive news, they did end up giving away the old Linux laptops to the employees when they moved office.

        • thejml@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          It’s a support question. It may cost $2k more for a Mac, but if it’s officially supported, auto patched, remote managed and they can prove it with security tools, force patching and restrict users, use standard well known tools for compliance and security monitoring/administration/etc, they will easily save thousands in corp licensing, training costs and legal costs. That $2k+ really becomes negligible.

    • Peffse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      Any source on that mac claim? I’ve not seen any proof of that at all.

      (Edit: To clarify, I know people are saying they use MacOS here, but I don’t think the claim that most tech people in corporate settings use MacOS to be true. I only have my personal experience in a very large corporate environment, and am asking for information as every team I’ve worked with was using Windows.)

      • Kualk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        I am a software developer and work on Kubernetes based project.

        I was given a Mac laptop when I joined. It was a few OS releases behind, because corporate IT didn’t support newer versions.

        Macs have to run some sort of VM to do docker based development.

        VMs are not that great.

        When time came, I requested a Windows laptop. I installed Debian on WSL 2. Then got it to run systemd properly and installed Docker on WSL. Then vscode on windows host with remote ssh into WSL.

        This setup beats Mac any day for me.

        I wish I could run Linux on work laptop, but corporate IT doesn’t know how to deal with it.