• Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So my understanding is

    • Guilty plea = “I’m guilty” = Harsh punishment
    • Alford plea = “I’m innocent” = Mild punishment

    Then why doesn’t everyone take the Alford plea, instead?

    • nogooduser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think that from a legal point of view there is no difference between the two. If you do an Alford plea then you still can’t appeal because you pleaded guilty.

      The harsh and mild sentence part is a negotiation. The prosecution is interested in getting a plea deal because it saves time and resources and the defendant is interested in getting a lighter sentence if they’re pretty confident that they’ll be convicted anyway.

    • kobra@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      No it’s more like:

      Go to trial = no plea deal at all = risking harsher sentence OR you know you can prove your innocence

      Guilty plea = accepting full responsibility for the crime and accepting the prosecutions deal of (usually) a lesser sentence to skip the trial and go straight to punishment.

      Alford plea = same as above but maintaining that you are innocent of the charges but cannot prove that against the prosecutions evidence.

      As others have stated, an Alford plea often has to be approved or accepted by the judge or prosecutors so it’s not always an option for everyone.