But removing Denuvo DRM after 12 weeks ‘causes zero mean total revenue loss.’

  • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This. Any time paying customers get treated worse than pirates, they’re only incentivised to pirate next time. It absolutely blows my mind that corpos seem incapable of figuring that out.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      As much as people don’t want to hear this, it’s a case of the Berlin Wall.

      EVERYBODY hated the Berlin wall. If the soviets wanted East Germans to stay in their hypothetical borders, then they should make living environments that encourage people to WANT to be there.

      Except they didn’t. They built a wall, and made it impossible to pass. And guess what? The amount of people leaving their country went from an alarming high number of escapees, to near zero. It may have been unpopular, but it was effective.

      Now, with the DRM. If they can make an effective DRM that kills piracy, they’ll make more money by preventing piracy than they’ll lose from non-sales protests.

      Unpopular, but effective. That’s their logic. And the amount of people not buying in protest is miniscule.

      It’s like me protesting the Cleveland Browns until 2027. I don’t appriciate a rapist being on our team. However, everybody else wants him to have a great season. They still spend their money on NFL packages, and go to games, and buy merch. ME not spending a dime in protest only works if the majority do it as well. Which isn’t the case, sadly.

      So until the majority protest DRM games, the DRM will be unpopular, but effective.