• archomrade [he/him]@midwest.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I am admittedly being lax with the definition, but they are certainly defending an authoritarian state and their atrocities committed in service of an ideological state project.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      but they are certainly defending an authoritarian state and their atrocities in service of an ideological state project.

      that’s just a generic authoritarian. tankie specifically shill perverted version of communism based on Lenin/Stalin/Mao, excusing their crimes and glorifying history of USSR as something that was good.

      They do side with Palestinians on this issue, mainly because Israel is supported by Imperial US.

      • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Mainly because “the jews sided with the capitalist” Stalin literally committed a second holocaust and pushed the “anti imperialism” theory where Israel is a colonial state and shit like that, most people in Israel are natives or refugees that have feed other countries where they haven’t been save anymore. There is a reason why the only jews in middle-east are in Israel or in their Army/Government

              • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                What? The Nazis also killed many others i seriously don’t get your bullshit here. Everyone with a little history literacy knows about the holodomor, or what the Soviets did to eastern Europe in general, there are literally reports that the average person was better off under the fucking Nazis, im not going to judge on that im not from that time gladly. Whats your point here?

                • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  That while antisemitism within USSR was a thing, it never amount to outright ethnic persecution unless you going to talk pruges of 1930s. But those purges had nothing to do with with victims being jewish or otherwise, Stalin was just disposing of useful idiots after they did his dirty jobs such as holodomor.

                  bottom line, it was hardly “a second holocaust”

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Idk, I guess I don’t see the point of the distinction, they’re both still defending authoritarian atrocities along ideological lines.

        Unless the point is that they’re nominally communist and that somehow makes them uniquely or especially bad?

        If that’s the case then it more seems like we’re being selectively critical of communism, not authoritarianism.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The distinction matters, that’s why it’s a whole separate word.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          tankie is has a specific meaning, ie a communist who will enforce his will with a barrel of the tank, refering when USSR invaded its EE satellites to prevent popular liberalization.

          what makes them bad is justifying state violence.

          communism is a separate topic from the tankie imho. they are just parasites shilling foreign state actors narratives or larping because life in williamsburg is too good.