• MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Leviticus Its in the pick and choose portion of the king james opinion of the bible.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think something like this would be carried over into the new covenant as the spirit of the law remained

      • MehBlah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Except they don’t do that. What they do is pick and choose from the old testament and ignore any part of the new testament that is inconvenient. Not all of them. Just the majority of them. What they do instead is take away the benches least someone in need to sleep there. They punish those that feed the needy in many places. They pass laws to make the most venerable of us criminals for daring to exist in their presence.

        I don’t listen to what people say. I watch what they do. What the majority of christians in my area do is hateful and very non christian. All of them are convinced though that god always wants exactly what they want.

    • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well it is “the Rules of the Tribe of Levi” canonically speaking they are laws made not by God but by a bunch of priests. It is important for biblical historical context reasons but technically speaking these are ancient society laws. It’s why instructional portions detailing animal sacrifice are included in that section when modern Christians tend to look at animal sacrifice as a satanic cult kind of thing.

      Provided you are Christian ( before the atheists start in, I’m not - I just study the religion as a part of gaining historical background info) Using Leviticus to justify one’s opinions on anything strikes me as showing that one read the text absent the scholarly context. A lot of Christians do this because book annotations wouldn’t be a thing before 1000 AD and it really benefited a lot of powerful people to never mention context of the compiling process of the book because once the supposed less than divine fingerprints on the processed material are brought to light it weakens it’s power as a tool of authority.

      • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        canonically speaking they are laws made not by God

        but the passage ends with God signing off on the law

        • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          So next time you’re at the tabernacle or trying to be being a priest you’ll know how to behave, sure.

          God signs of on mortal codes of governance multiple times in the text. Obedience to “Laws of the land” are a thing in other texts. The order seems to be “be orderly and in accordance to whatever the power structure where you are agrees is fair” it is pretty all over the place, Romans, Deuteronomy, Paul, Hebrews Numbers… God wields a pretty big ole rubber stamp.

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah, you don’t use the 5e handbook as your character sheet, just like you don’t use the Bible as your moral code.

      You get to not play as a charitable and kind Christian if you don’t want to, you can just as well play a greedy and mean subclass.