I know there are lots of people that do not like Ubuntu due to the controversies of Snaps, Canonicals head scratching decisions and their ditching of Unity.

However my experience using Ubuntu when I first used it wasn’t that bad, sure the snaps could take a bit or two to boot up but that’s a first time thing.

I’ve even put it on my younger brothers laptop for his school and college use as he just didn’t like the updates from Windows taking away his work and so far he’s been having a good time with using this distro.

I guess what I’m tryna say is that Ubuntu is kind of the “Windows” of the Linux world, yes it’s decisions aren’t always the best, but at least it has MUCH lenient requirements and no dumb features from Windows 11 especially forced auto updates.

What are your thoughts and experiences using Ubuntu? I get there is Mint and Fedora, but how common Ubuntu is used, it seemed like a good idea for my bros study work as a “non interfering” idea.

Your thoughts?

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    My workplace preinstalls Ubuntu, personally I’m using openSUSE. I don’t even think that Ubuntu is particularly bad, I’m mainly frustrated with it, because it’s just slightly worse than openSUSE (and other distros) in pretty much every way.
    It’s less stable, less up-to-date, less resilient to breakages. And it’s got more quirky behaviour and more things that are broken out-of-the-box. And it doesn’t even have a unique selling point. It’s just extremely mid, and bad at it.

  • SeikoAlpinist@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Ubuntu was a successful attempt to make Debian user-friendly. If you don’t remember Linux in 2003, it took a lot of time to configure.

    Ubuntu came along and did everything automatically from first install. Some of the polish it had was things like smooth fonts, TrueType font support (remember old XFree86 Bitmap fonts?) a GUI installer, automatically detecting your monitor resolution, setting up sound automatically, and automatic downloading of firmware needed to make your hardware work. In just one reboot after install, you had a usable system that looked really nice, with smooth fonts.

    In 2024, Debian already does all of this out of the box. The value add of Ubuntu is minimal. Ubuntu provides a theme, a splash screen when booting up, a custom font, and a modified version of the Dash to Dock extension that you can just download yourself from the Gnome extension site. That’s it. One might argue that snaps make Ubuntu worse than Debian.

    Just use Debian. If you want a somewhat more polished system (nice cursors, unique icons, easy to configure animations), there is Mint Debian edition.

    It takes less time to just set up Debian to look and behave like Ubuntu (about 10 minutes) than it takes to continually fight against Ubuntu snaps.

    Just use Debian.

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t like snaps (nor flatpaks for that matter, they’re too big for my slow internet connection here in my Greek village). But I find it absolutely, 100%, crazy to install gimp and darktable via snaps, and not being able to print (the print option is just not there, because they’re snaps and somehow they haven’t implemented that for these apps). As an artist who sells prints, this makes the whole distro completely and utterly USELESS to me. Sure, they can be found as deb packages too, but they’re older. And Firefox is also sandboxed. And when I installed Chromium from the command line as a deb, it OVERWROTE my wish, and installed Chromium as a snap too.

    So, no ubuntu for me. The only advantage it has is that many third party apps (usually commercial ones) that release binary tarballs or appimages have tested with ubuntu and they usually work well (minus davinci resolve). I don’t have a big trouble with appimages as they’re generally smaller than the kde/gnome frameworks that flatpaks/snaps use, and they’re one file-delete away from getting rid of them completely. They’re just more straightforward.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Thanks for giving me a shot at a woke moment now

        That was racist. There is nothing wrong with worshiping Olympian gods. You are a right-wing-conservative-republican-christian-homophobic-misogonistic-white-supremacist-rapper-patriarch.

        Lol, I honestly don’t know how woke people manage to find all this crap on any comments, and you just saw me try 🤣🤣🤣

    • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      What sort of printers do you make your prints with? And do you print directly from GIMP or from something else? I’ve been trying to set up a FOSS printing workflow using Canon giclee printers, which has been mostly successful but I haven’t yet figured out how to print custom sizes on roll paper, only standard sizes on sheet paper.

      • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I use sheet paper to be honest on an Epson printer. I do use Gimp to print, although most of my editing is happening on Photopea in the browser (gimp didn’t cut it for me as an editor for my paintings, I needed adjustment layers and Secondary Colors). Then, I export a JPEG, and print from Gimp (because the browser doesn’t have all the printing options that gimp has). I use the Debian-Testing rolling release.

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, this kind of things drove me batty on Ubuntu. So many things were delivered as Snaps when they just don’t work that way. The funniest one to me was Filebot. It’s a media file naming/organizing tool…that doesn’t have disk access. Are you kidding me, Canonical?

      Flatpak is easier to work with, but has similar issues. Great for simple things, but I’m always worried that at some point I’m going to need some features that just won’t work, and then it’s going to be a hassle to migrate to a native installation. And it has no CLI support.

      And yeah, the bloat is wild. Deduplication on btrfs (or similar) helps but there’s no getting past the bandwidth bloat.

      • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, i hear you. I once installed the new version of snap (and later flatpak) of the gnome ide, and it couldn’t find the vala compiler, because it was outside the sandboxing. Totally useless.

        And yes, it’s bloated. Nothing works with less 1.6 gb of ram. But then again, it’s the same on fedora.

        • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I use Fedora Workstation, and that is not the case at all. I will agree that an Arch based distro will arguably give you much more control over everything, but to compare Fedora to Ubuntu? That’s just silly.

          • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I was talking about memory usage, not the rest of the stuff. Yes, Fedora uses as much RAM as Ubuntu.

            • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Ah, that being the case, you’re also somewhat wrong. For the most part, Fedora actually uses a bit more RAM and resources than Ubuntu.

        • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I forget the exact terminology but I tried putting it into the most permissive mode available. Is still could not work with external hard drives. This was several years ago so I can’t say what might have changed since then, but I did spend some time troubleshooting and at the time that functionality did not work. I’d read that it was possible in the previous version (maybe 18.04?)

          Edit: Come to think of it, it might not have been as simple as “couldn’t access external drives”. It might have had something to do with how my disks were mounted and their permissions and mount points. I remember that I hit a wall at some point and further troubleshooting would have required more surgery on my system than I was willing to attempt.

    • Molten_Moron@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      And when I installed Chromium from the command line as a deb, it OVERWROTE my wish, and installed Chromium as a snap too.

      This right here is my issue with Ubuntu. A huge part of Linux for me is that I am in control of my OS and machine. If I use apt to install a package, it’s because I want the .deb version. I absolutely don’t need my OS telling me “I know what you asked for, but I’m going to give you the snap version anyway”.

      I could see snaps being preferred over .debs in the Software app, sure (though they shouldn’t be the only option). But replacing apps in a command line tool is garbage.

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        As far as the software app goes, I like how Mint handles it: it clearly marks what’s a system install and what’s a Flatpak, and if both are available it makes it easy to select which one you want. At no point does it try to hide or obfuscate it.

  • ffhein@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Personally I’m not looking an OS that is “not so bad”, the initial impression should be “this is great” :)

    Ubuntu is kind of the “Windows” of the Linux world

    That’s also the thing, I switched to Linux because I hated using Windows, and I don’t like how Microsoft operates. The last think I want is a distribution which tries to be Windows made by a company which tries to be Microsoft. It’s of course an exaggeration, and Ubuntu doesn’t do EEE and patent trolling as far as I know, but at least for me it feels like they’re going in the wrong direction when they keep reinventing the wheel, forcing solutions that users don’t want, and generally trying to create a “one size fits all” desktop. I’m not against it, Ubuntu is probably a good choice for some users, it just doesn’t fit me. I used Xubuntu for many years, and I also tried both Gnome and Unity at different points, but currently I use Fedora KDE.

  • thews@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ubuntu is fine. Drivers are annoying on all distros (nvidia updates for me mainly, I don’t update hardware often).

    I have daily driven various distros and tested a lot since the 90s and I pay close attention to time spent on customizing and fixes, and ubuntu just isn’t worse than other distros. I make setup scripts and have custom dockerfiles for webtops.

    I want to like nixos or whatever fork will prevail, but it’s more work than people want to admit. I personally don’t want to have to pay that much attention to my operating system. It’s why i ditched gentoo almost 20 years ago. I don’t want to lurk forums for fixes and tweaks. I also make sure hardware I buy doesn’t have glaring compatibility issues.

    If Ubuntu rubs you the wrong way but you are fine with most of it, just use debian.

    • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I watched a video of a Linux noob trying it for the first time. They chose Mint, and a significant amount of problems arose from the fact that mint is still on an old kernel version, and there was little to no indication from the OS or from cursory googling that updating it would fix the issue or even that you should do that.

      • TechnicallyColors@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Mint uses the same kernel version as Ubuntu, so that’s not really a point in favor of Ubuntu in any case. Do you remember what video it was?

          • TechnicallyColors@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Nice, I’ll have to watch this. A quick skim through the YT comments says that it’s AMD drivers which is the only thing I could think of. Linux Mint 21 actually has an “EDGE” iso which has a newer kernel version, and Linux Mint 22 is instead going to track the latest HWE kernels, so my understanding is this type of hardware problem should be a thing of the past at least in Linux Mint’s world. I don’t know if Ubuntu has their own plans or not.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        If you open up the kernel manager you can switch to a newer release

        Also I think they now have a version with a newer kernel

  • hddsx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I only joke about Arch being the superior distro because, well, I use it and because it’s apparently a thing.

    I actually don’t have any strong feelings about Ubuntu. It’s a distro. It works. I only use Arch because of the AUR (I’m lazy, okay?). I don’t have strong feelings about it either. Linux is configurable to basically exactly what you want. Once (or if) you get into customization you just pick the distro that allows you to get to what you want faster.

    I do have strong feelings about Windows though.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Canonical historically makes bad decisions. Ubuntu any most points in time is simply great. Their LTS is fab. But they’re hungry. And they screw with us over time. the latest Debian just erased most of the reason to go with Ubuntu adding nonfree, and they haven’t screwed us over.

  • 4vr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    தமிழ்
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ubuntu used to work out of the box and with sensible defaults but that’s no longer the case.

    Gave Ubuntu another try a month back and external monitor resolution wasn’t right at all.

    Switched back to Pop OS.

  • ace_garp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I remember when Ubuntu was released, and I still have one of the first or second release Ubuntu shipit CDs.

    Ubuntu was good at marketing and they were good at making things ‘just work’.

    It was often the recommended choice of starter-distro due to hardware compatibility.

    I’ve installed and admin’ed Ubuntu on 20 PCs in a small office setting, and it provides a decent user experience.

    I would not personally use Ubuntu.

    My daily driver now is Trisquel GNU/Linux, which is Ubuntu with all non-free packages(and binary blobs) removed.

    If you are at the stage where you know how to source hardware that works with FLOSS-drivers, try out a fully-free FSF approved distro.

    https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.en.html

    Clean, with zero corporate fluff.

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    But it seems like there are other easy distros with lenient requirements that don’t try to force Snaps and ads on their users.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah I don’t hate Ubuntu, I used it as my daily driver for years, but it did get a bit frustrating how they seem to fixate on the new ‘shiny’ thing (Unity, Mir, the whole convergent desktop thing, now Snaps) and chase after it while other things are left to stagnate, then they seem to get it to where it’s almost good, then drop it and go chasing off after something else.

      Also, I find that these days there are just better options for a ‘just works’ kind of distro (like Mint or Pop!OS) so I don’t hate Ubuntu, I just have no particular need for it anymore.

  • lem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    While the criticism may be valid, it doesn’t make sense to someone new to Linux.

    It’s easy to switch to Ubuntu from Windows, and it’s easier to switch from Ubuntu to another distro.

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Ubuntu was a big part of my path to full time Linux use. I adore everyone who has contributed to Ubuntu.

    But also, Snaps are bullshit, and are why I replaced all my Ubuntu installs with Debian.

    Canonical doesn’t get to pretend to be surprised by the backlash for pushing an unnecessary closed proprietary platform on their freedom seeking users.

    I still adore everyone at Canonical and in the Ubuntu community, for all they’ve done for the Linux community. Y’all still rock. Thanks!

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Its not like it is the only option. There are so many better systems these days it isn’t even funny. Use Linux Mint, Fedora, Pop OS or maybe even Bazzite.

    • model_tar_gz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The funny thing here is that there are many good distributions that are based on Ubuntu. I’m a Pop!_OS fanboy, many of my colleagues enjoy Mint. Yet, almost everyone I know in the Linux world despises Ubuntu.