• 0 Posts
  • 43 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 15th, 2023

help-circle




  • This is a topic that could be a novel for how much there is to consider, but in the end it comes down to resources and companies trying to choose what it best for the company overall. For a company to do anything, they are giving up many other things they could be doing instead. Whether it is limited budgets, limited personnel, or company priorities every decision made is always a tradeoff that means you aren’t doing something else.

    Most companies prioritize releasing new product so they can start getting revenue from it as soon as possible. A new product has the largest potential market, and thus makes shareholders happy to see revenue coming in. The sales from a new product are the easiest ones in most product’s lifecycle. Additionally. releasing new products helps keep you ahead of competitors. So ongoing maintenance work is de-prioritized over working on new things.

    The goal of testing is to simulate potential use cases of a product and ensure that it will work as expected when the customer has the product in their hands. It is impossible to fully test a product in a finite amount of time, so tests are created that expose flaws within a reasonable search space of the expected uses. If an issue is found then it needs to be evaluated about whether it is worth fixing and when. There are many factors that affect this, for example:

    • How much would it cost to fix?
    • How much time would it take to fix?
    • Does it need to be fixed for launch or can it be a running change?
    • How many customers are actually going to see the issue? Is it just a small annoyance for them or will it cause returns/RMAs?
    • Is it within the expected use case of the product?
    • Can we mitigate it in software/firmware instead of changing hardware?
    • Is it a compliance/regulatory issue?
    • Would this bring in new customers for the product?
    • Was this done a specific way for a reason?

    Unfortunately, after considering all this the result is often that it isn’t worth the effort to fix something, but it is considered.



  • Even in that context it doesn’t make any sense. BC saw how badly the BC Liberals fucked everything up for a decade+ they were in power due to their corruption for corporate interests and kicked them to the curb. Now we have a government that is actually trying to fix important things like housing costs, healthcare, and the environment yet the people are saying "Nah, we would prefer what conservative governments in other provinces are doing to make services worse by privatizing them. "

    I get that people are unhappy with their decline of quality of life, but we know from looking elsewhere that a Conservative government is not the solution that helps most people.





  • Yes we are pretty much in agreement, though I take some issue with your first paragraph that insinuates that men want to “usher in another go of fascism” rather than them just being manipulated by the bad actors that actually want to institute fascism within the western world. Nobody come out and blatantly says they want to institute fascism, they make positive sounding promises to those that feel like they have been left behind by society. You acknowledge it yourself with the dichotomy of supporting the NDP and the Conservatives at the same time.

    I believe a large part of it is men don’t have access to role models like they used to. Especially with millenials and after, so many people have both parents working full time and they don’t have the guidance of their parents to the same level as in the past. Not to mention the many split up families where they specifically get even less time with male role models. As a society we have lost a lot of community spaces as well that would serve as a check to children that are going the wrong way. The irony of the explanation essentially being that things are fucked because of a change to traditional family values isn’t lost on me, but I don’t have a better way of expressing it.

    As to why it affects men so much more than women, a theory of mine is that boys are just less able to do the things that boys tend to like to do in the past like getting outside and getting their energy out through play (that is sometimes rough). They instead bottle up energy and anger because there is nowhere to learn to express themselves in their daily lives. They have been pushed to a more femine way of play when many don’t feel comfortable with it, not to mention society still not generally accepting boys and men who express themselves in a more feminine way.

    Here is a video of the NDP convention I was thinking of. On rewatch it isn’t quite as bad as I remember, but still is a really bad look and should have been handled very differently. Especially considering the NDPs traditional union worker base that would certainly find it insulting.


  • In some ways I don’t even blame them. When pretty much every other part of society is telling young men that they aren’t wanted, they are going to turn to whoever is willing to welcome them with open arms. Instead of turning them into allies for those who are disadvantaged they have been told, “No yo go the back of the line.” (sometimes literally, looking at you federal NDP). This results in a large portion of society that is being “radicalized” by the far right because it is the space that welcomes them and makes them feel like part of something, even when it will harm them and our society in the long run.







  • Yes, someone stole a game console from my room in university. Then I caught them selling it on craigslist, contacted them, got their name and got them arrested and my console back.

    Lucky for me that I had reported it to the police since I was considering using insurance to cover it. The officer that took the info recognised the persons name because he had pulled the guy over that week and thought it would be fun to catch him with stolen goods as well.