• 0 Posts
  • 87 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 14th, 2023

help-circle









  • This happened more than 15 years ago and is a pretty wild ride. I may have a few minor details askew, but this is the basic story.

    There was this police officer who was operating as a controller for another undercover police officer. A controller is the interface between the undercover guy and his team in the office. It allows the undercover guy to operate loose as a goose and the controller runs about behind the scenes making things happen.

    Well, one night the controller gets completely hammered, off his tits drunk, then picks up a hooker and takes her to a dodgy motel and has sex. Then he passes out. The hooker couldn’t wake him, so she takes his car keys and drives to where she was picked up from and abandons his undercover car with the keys still in the ignition.

    Back in the hotel, the controller wakes up to find the car gone - along with suitcase containing several thousand dollars that was sitting in the trunk. Every note in the stash, naturally, had the serial number recorded.

    The controller panicked and called a bunch of off-duty and on-duty friends who attempted to locate the car, and hopefully the drug-buy cash, before they had to officially report what happened.

    In the end, they couldn’t find the car, so the controller self-reported the whole sorry story. He was arrested and sacked, but didn’t do time. They eventually found the car, still with the keys in the ignition and the cash still sitting in the trunk, safe and sound. All his friends got into various amounts of trouble for assisting with the cover-up.

    Bonus points. While this wild escapade was happening the controller’s wife was sitting at home with a newborn baby.

    It is still talked about today - with reverence - as the single biggest display of mass stupidity in the department.






  • slickgoat@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzWe lost Keanu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I would say that you continue to litigate a point that I never made in the first place. I have no opinion about the rights or wrongs of Hancock’s theories/claims. My entire point - my only point - is that if he is making entertainment, so what? Not allowing him to film in national parks because it offends science is wrong on so many levels.

    Lastly, I didn’t ask you to chime in, so I’m not bothered if you beg off. See ya!



  • slickgoat@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzWe lost Keanu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sounds like a whole lot of butthurt to me?

    Science isn’t perfect either, a fact which scientists tend to push under the rug.

    I’m an old fart, so I can remember the great scientific scare campaign of the 1970. Global cooling. It didn’t come from the great unwashed masses either, it can from professional researchers in white coats and worried brows. They got it wrong, and contributed to the beginnings of scientific distrust we have today.

    Spare me the whole diatribe about intellectual fraud. You guys need to get your act together and communicate better rather than just sit in the friggin clouds and tut tut against the hoi polloi.


  • slickgoat@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzWe lost Keanu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    So criticise Hancock’s theories. Nobody is saying that archeologists can’t do that scientifically.

    What I’m suggesting is that acting all butthurt when confronted with alternate theories and banning amateurs from entering the field is akin to protecting the priesthood.

    Once again, not defending Hancock’s ideas, but I’m being critical of science’s reaction to them. Anyway, you guys are not very adroit in doing so. We are about to start watching the third season and he’s using your actions to fuel the fire.


  • slickgoat@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzWe lost Keanu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Very good explanation, and I respect your point of view.

    Even with that in hand, scientists can still be sometimes too precious. Being the official and truth holder of all things can also keep gifted amateurs out of the running. I’m not anti-science, I’m a fan. There is a long history of professionals jealousy guarding a patch that is not necessarily always ethical.

    Anyway, that is the exception.