I saw quite a few people sitting outside their houses with their candy ready for the kids. Some even organized them on tables so the kids could come up, pick one, be handed it and go.
I saw quite a few people sitting outside their houses with their candy ready for the kids. Some even organized them on tables so the kids could come up, pick one, be handed it and go.
Ah, IIRC Element X was the only client that supported sliding sync previously; That makes sense
Will synapse have these changes soon?
Yes. It’s a tech/ nerd bubble here.
Yeah, just me. Not available externally without VPN access.
None, I self host Whoogle.
All of mine are working. For some you might need to enable to compatibility mode, which disabled some of the added exploit protections provided by GOS.
Ah got it. I was looking at the UDM Pro. Is that a router and a controller? If so, I should be able to access locally I’d hope
Oh interesting. So you can’t manage Ubiquiti devices without an Internet connection? TIL
Would you use it at home over PF/OPNsense?
Brooke of the Straw Hat pirates
The goal would be to have a collection of many locations
This looks very interesting; Will look into it! Thank you.
Ah that makes sense, thank you. For now I’m doing backdoor Roth IRA contributions as I can’t do direct contributions. Eventually I hope to be able to also use the mega backdoor after I fill up the pre-tax federal contribution limits for 401k. That will be “after-tax” that is converted to Roth.
Thank you for the feedback! I played the options in another comment, and it seems your advice is shared by others!
Wow, great advice! Thanks so much. My rIRA is through Vanguard, and I do want a brokerage account at some point in the future for mid/long term savings.
I’ll likely go with a blend of the Vanguard options, but just so I know, why might it be better to do so if I have an IRA and plan to have a brokerage in the future? Just so I have more “dials to turn” to match my tolerances?
Is keeping everything inside of a local “walled garden”, then exposing the minimum amount of services needed to a WireGuard VPN not sufficient?
There would be be no attack surface from WAN other than the port opened to WireGuard