I think I agree with you and my irony just got lost. But again, I don’t know enough to be sure.

All I’m sure about is that if you use your biological non-consensus to tell folks what their identity should be it’s shitty.

And I think we were arguing the same thing but I’m tired.

But that’s obviously the people trying to redefine sex to not be using the gametes.

Look y’all I know nothing about biology but I’ve heard enough definitions of sex to know that there isn’t a clear consensus on one, binary or not. I do know that if you want to wellactually a binary definition into this you might be part of the problem. (Unless, that is, it’s interesting enough and you phrase it differently idk.)

Boil em, mash em, throw em in the sea.

Why not both? The system might need aftercare too.

If only squirrel weren’t a popular sql gui tool already.

I mean yea. Don’t see your point, it’s still an uglification of a useful language

Doesn’t react have scoped styles like vue does?

This honestly is what tailwind looks like to people who know css.

Fair enough. But all of these are heavily advertised.

Why on earth would you build a CMS with excel.

I mean I know why but WHYYYYYY

SeaShell sounds like it’s a zsh plugin tbh.

These are all major commercial services that can afford advertising or are already more than established. Most FOSS doesn’t have these perks.

Nah, they actively got worse as authoritarian governments are wont to do.

Yup. It’s something that’s crippling to us for sure, but imo doesn’t hurt to acknowledge that it makes us a total piece of work for our surroundings.

What I take the person above to say is that there’s just too many people who expect everyone else to accept their annoying habits.

Which, well, I don’t even accept in myself so it’d be rich to expect others to do.

Casualgeografic had a video where he explained that pure herbivores aren’t really a thing in nature; animals are gonna eat what’s easy.

How preprendious of you.

I thought it was hilarious. As a pure hommage to old trek that episode was amazing, and it didn’t try to be anything else.

That doesn’t make it fundamentally flawed. I also can’t completely describe all muscle movement involved and yet I can walk.

Gödel’s incompleteness theorem has to be the most overhyped thing since a certain cat. For logicians, it mainly means that “is it probable” is a valid question for prepositions that are otherwise vastly esoteric in nature.

Ohhh haha that makes sense. Fun!

I like your questions about this and they all seem fair but I kinda wanna encourage you to go ahead and write it yourself; it’s a fun way to convert into Roman numerals that both is and isn’t intuitive at the same time.