In a previous thread with a similar topic @blibla@[email protected] linked a study that actually was able to support this claim: https://digitalcommons.newhaven.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2018&context=americanbusinessreview

thanks

tldr: the study links crime(categorized into violent and property crime) to a net benefit of the people living in the neighborhood through having more money available. I did not read it fully so please correct me if im wrong.

Does it tho? And even if it does, arent there ways to keep housing prices low with less downsides? I would be sincerely interested in examples where this actually worked.

i had that error once, but i swear the next time it just worked.

maybe try to copy again or copy from the source of the comment.

Anarchy is about living. Its against anything that that stops folks from actually living and thriving. It does so by maximizing peoples autonomy in their lives and by giving them actual self determination. For this we have to look at every part of our lives, our society, our world and scrub it free from domination. TBH just what crimethinc says in To Change Everything - an anarchist appeal lol

Just in case someone wants more context:

This is the “Amazon tower” in Berlin, a huge (for Berlin) office building that will be mainly/exclusively used by Amazon and this sparked some protests.

More infos heres: https://berlinvsamazon.noblogs.org/

I made one theme that tries to mirror the current default one on slrpnk.net. You can add it to your list of themes here: https://photon.slrpnk.net/theme

{“slate”:{“25”:“249 253 252”,“50”:“226 245 243”,“100”:“249 253 252”,“200”:“226 232 240”,“300”:“203 213 225”,“400”:“148 163 184”,“500”:“85 187 184”,“600”:“105 122 121”,“700”:“85 187 184”,“800”:“35 51 51”,“900”:“35 51 51”,“950”:“35 51 51”},“zinc”:{“50”:“85 187 184”,“100”:“226 245 243”,“300”:“226 245 243”,“400”:“157 175 174”,“500”:“153 214 212”,“600”:“85 187 184”,“700”:“105 122 121”,“800”:“105 122 121”,“900”:“105 122 121”,“925”:“58 73 73”,“950”:“35 51 51”},“primary”:{“100”:“184 202 201”,“900”:“85 187 184”},“other”:{“black”:“36 31 49”,“white”:“249 253 252”}}

I dont have an idea for them, but I call dips on the windshield wipers

Appreciate the section about Lemmy drama, I totally missed the whole thing. Also learned somethings about cat diets i guess

Yeah and still we should not push the message that Telegrams encryption is even remotely close to other encrypted messengers. I met more than one person that somehow thought their messages in Telegram are “safer” than they are in WhatsApp (and they never activated the encrypted chat oprion in Telegram)

It took the german goverment years to force Telegram to comply with their requests to get data and shut down specific groups. Also based on your location things that might be legal are not legal in a different location, from a German legal perspective there still lots of things happening in Telegram that are atleast a grey area(piracy, hate speech, porn) or straight up illegal(drugs, terrorist groups propaganda).

I am not in favor of the arrest or any goverment repression btw, I am just adding why goverments in europe might want to do stuff like this.

I dont think Telegram is something that I would call an “encrypted messenger”

Considering how hard it is for goverments to actually get Telegram to shutdown criminal chat groups or get chat logs (of unencrypted ) groups I think its at least more reasonable than the whole idea of banning E2E encryption.

80000+ Core Members. Seems like a big cult.

Or maybe instead of dunking China should do something that actually helps the workers of greece, who might need all the solidarity they can get.

Ich finde es absurd das selbst eine linke Zeitung wie die taz mit witschaftlichen Potenzial argumentiert und nicht humanistischen Idealen

Ich finde ihm würde ein Milkshake im Gesicht gut stehen

Warum?

Lange nichtmehr gesehen, danke fürs Gedächtnis auffrischen

Also wenn du Polizei abschaffen willst, den Staat fundamental ablehnst und die Grundpfeiler der aktuellen Wirtschaftsordnung einreißen willst, dann klar bist du linksradikal und nach Maßstäben des Verfassungsschutz halt linksextrem.

Ich finde aber auch, dass der Verfassungsschutz für mich keinen Einfluss drauf hat was oder wen ich gut oder schlecht finde.