

It’s a 3-2-1 backup, one drive is 16tb and the other is a backup that turns on once a week. If one drive fails they’re under warranty. Files are also uploaded to the cloud.


It’s a 3-2-1 backup, one drive is 16tb and the other is a backup that turns on once a week. If one drive fails they’re under warranty. Files are also uploaded to the cloud.


NAS. 1 drive = maybe 8 watts. Motherboard itself = 12w.


That list is no longer accurate. See cybenetics labs.


If I put a tungsten cube under water I wouldn’t really call it wet. But if I sprayed it with water I would. But that changes when it’s a person, no? The type of surface it is depends as well, not all surfaces are equal - like something that is water phobic (aerogel) can make something not wet even though it (person + aerogel) is in contact with water. I’m not arguing water isn’t wet. I absolutely think it is by our language. But I am saying there isn’t a good way of arriving at that conclusion by going full Webster Dictionary.


“It’s when water is touching a surface” blah blah I can easily disprove it by doing this or that. There is a surface of water in a bucket, does that become wet when I pour more water? Then you have to say “solid surfaces,” but furthermore am I “wet” if I enter a body of water fully submerged? No, I’m “under water” and saying I’m wet would be weird. Is the bottom of a bucket “wet” or does it contain water? How much water can something have on it for it to be “wet” or “submerged”? The irony is that by doing this you remove yourself from the process by delegating it to a definition, when according to history, language has mostly been arbitrary and man-made. All of these cases are caught by our arbitrary rules. By arguing water is wet or not without mentioning anthropic usage would make you wrong, by default.
You did not have permission to take this picture of me.
When I peed my pants in them in the 2nd grade. My parents got some for me in high school, but they were so tight I could not wear them.


Yeah… I’m not sure anymore that pre-builts are the best NAS machines. Looks like I’m buying piecemeal.


Picture I linked looks like it will fit.
Actually…


I think Deep Glacier is cheaper if you’re backing up less than 8 TB, so I think I may have to go with Backblaze if I end up using up all 12 TB. Really depends.


Thanks, I’m saving this. I’m very unacquainted with plumbing / carpentry so I wouldn’t have thought of this.


yep, that one. They claim it has a 2tb hd in it so the 3.5" is most likely populated, but good catch! I also have extra cables lying around, so cables won’t be a worry.
creative
I hope not too creative. I think there’s some standard adapter online.


Amazon AWS Glacier
Edit: I was downvoted for this, but it’s genuinely a more affordable alternative to Backblaze whose finances are questionable.


I like the jab here but I don’t like how some of these deepfakes are indistinguishable from real life if you remove some context and view it on a smartphone


I’m graduating a year later too.


I highly recommend the man pages versus what is on Google. Type ‘man’ or ‘man -k’ to search them. Also available on the web for your particular distro.
Also you might wanna increase the block size in dd. And, it might be faster to use dump and restore, since that isn’t copying empty space.


I’ve obviously never been in contact with fiber glass insulation so I don’t know the risks besides the pictures here. Nonetheless the dangers of bare fiber optics glass contact are still dangerous which is where I draw my source of caution.
Also get a life, you are jumping to outrage over Internet comments


I went into my attic once and I shudder to think what I’d feel if the insulation up there was glass fiber. I sort of tripped up there.
For the same reason, optic fiber terrifies me. Microscopic glass needles embedding themselves into your skin.
OST gang ❤️