

“My fellow Reform members and I believe that our young people should be protected from exposure to potentially harmful ideologies”
The whole f*ing Reform platform is a toxic and actively harmful ideology. Projection as usual from the far right.
“My fellow Reform members and I believe that our young people should be protected from exposure to potentially harmful ideologies”
The whole f*ing Reform platform is a toxic and actively harmful ideology. Projection as usual from the far right.
Take my angry upvote and get out.
…wade in and look you in the eye and say “This. Feels. Right.”…
Superb, absolutely superb.
Thanks dude, glad someone appreciates it.
Thank you so much for taking the time to summarise and explain all this. I have really enjoyed having a little window into your remarkable world.
Thank you, that was very interesting. I was surprised at the definition of the basic open sets because they felt quite closed to my intuition, so the topology feels discrete to me. It’s definitely Hausdorff, I guess, but that’s no big deal. I’m guessing if you’re saying it uses a lot of the axioms, it uses the axiom of choice. It feels like that kind of arena, but I’m no set theorist. Having been taught by ring theorists, I always found the axiom of choice no big deal and totally uncontroversial, but I’m aware of the existence of mathematicians who feel otherwise, intuitionists (confusing name) and constructivists and the like. Do set theorists have a lot of debate about axioms, is it largely led by consensus, or deeply controversial, or just a case of making clear which you’re using and no one gets excited about it?
Indeed, indeed. But if you live in America, you should know that legal immigrants who attend protests are having their green cards rescinded, then their legal status removed, and then abducted by ICE. By the time they get to you, there will be no one left to protest.
Let’s assume I can prove the countability and non countability of various famous sets and, for example, that (ab)c = a^bc for cardinalities. What’s determinacy?
I had the exact same reaction.
So… the dead server controls who is even able to enter the building? Wow. That is one big juggernaut of a problem heading for you.
Yes, and that’s not even under the table.
Yup. Companies avoid paying taxes in one country by getting their divisions in other, lower tax countries to charge the one in the high tax country so much for intellectual property and branding etc that they make a loss in the high tax country, which in some countries entitles them to a tax rebate. It’s insane.
The crap leave it on the doorstep and hope no one nicks it delivery wasn’t a thing in my country until amazon made it a thing. Don’t make out they’re the good guys. They’re absolutely not.
I was pointing out that reposts aren’t reposts for everyone and some new people enjoy old posts fresh.
Nope nope nope nope nope nope nope.
Don’t do this, EU. You’re better than this.
Magnificent.
I think the dare thing is consistent with the mismatched shoes.
Yeah, but your problem there is that trump has no values other than “tell me I’m great and get me more money”, and his supporters have no values other than “fuck people that were born with darker skin than me”.
You can’t rescue democracy by trying to big tent with these haters.